• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Economic Theory >Individual sense of justice and Harsanyi's impartial observer
【24h】

Individual sense of justice and Harsanyi's impartial observer

机译：个人司法感和哈萨尼的公正观察者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We revisit, within Harsanyi's impartial observer setting, the question of foundations underlying procedural fairness concerns in welfare judgments. In our setup-that of allocating an indivisible good using a lottery-such concerns, presumably, matter. We draw from the social preferences literature and relax a typical assumption made while addressing this question, namely that individuals in society do not care about procedural fairness and such concerns arise exclusively at a societal level, which are captured by nonlinear social welfare functions (SWFs). In our model, individual attitudes toward procedural fairness are identified and factored into welfare judgments. Specifically, we provide an axiomatic basis within Harsanyi's (J Polit Econ 63:309-321, 1955) framework to represent procedural fairness sensitive individual preferences by the representation in Karni and Safra (Econometrica 70:263-284, 2002). We then show, in terms of underlying axioms, how such individual assessments incorporating both risk and procedural fairness attitudes can be aggregated by means of utilitarian and generalized utilitarian SWFs.
机译：我们重新审视了Harsanyi公正的观察员环境中，基础的问题是福利判决的程序公平问题。在我们的设置中 - 使用彩票分配不可分割的良好 - 这些问题，大概是重要的。我们从社会偏好文献中汲取文献，放松一个典型的假设，同时解决这个问题，即社会中的个人不关心程序公平，并且这些问题在社会级别（SWFS）被捕获的社会层面。在我们的模型中，个人对程序公平的态度被确定并考虑到福利判决。具体而言，我们在Harsanyi（J PORIT ECON 63：309-321,1955）内提供了一个公理基础，以代表Karni和Safra的代表代表程序公平敏感个人偏好（Moverictrica 70：263-284,2002）。然后，我们在基础公理方面表现出统一风险和程序公平态度的这种个人评估如何通过功利和广义的功利管理员汇总。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号