...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Economics & philosophy >ATHLETIC POLICY, PASSIVE WELL-BEING: DEFENDING FREEDOM IN THE CAPABILITY APPROACH
【24h】

ATHLETIC POLICY, PASSIVE WELL-BEING: DEFENDING FREEDOM IN THE CAPABILITY APPROACH

机译：运动政策，被动健康：在能力方法中捍卫自由

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

G.A. Cohen has criticized the capability approach for focusing on individuals' freedom - their capability to control their lives - and ignoring benefits achieved passively. He argues that this view of well-being is excessively 'athletic'. However, if the capability approach is employed to guide egalitarian public policy, capabilities are the appropriate goal of just distributive policies, not just components of individual well-being. When understood as a policy-guide, I argue that the capability approach's focus on 'athletic' individual freedom and control is justified: in the public domain, it is important not just that individuals receive benefits, but that they participate in their achievement.
机译：G.A.科恩（Cohen）批评了一种能力方法，该方法着眼于个人的自由-他们控制生活的能力-忽略了被动获得的利益。他认为，这种幸福感过于“运动”。但是，如果采用能力方法来指导平等公共政策，那么能力就是分配政策的适当目标，而不仅仅是个人福祉的组成部分。当被理解为政策指南时，我认为能力方法关注“运动”的个人自由和控制是有道理的：在公共领域，重要的是不仅个人要获得利益，而且他们要参与其成就。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号