HAUSMAN AND MCPHERSON ON WELFARE ECONOMICS AND PREFERENCE SATISFACTION THEORIES OF WELFARE: A CRITICAL NOTE

Alexander F. Sarch

首页> 外文期刊>Economics & philosophy >HAUSMAN AND MCPHERSON ON WELFARE ECONOMICS AND PREFERENCE SATISFACTION THEORIES OF WELFARE: A CRITICAL NOTE

【24h】

HAUSMAN AND MCPHERSON ON WELFARE ECONOMICS AND PREFERENCE SATISFACTION THEORIES OF WELFARE: A CRITICAL NOTE

机译：霍斯曼和麦克弗森关于福利经济学和福利优先满足理论的重要注解

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Hausman and McPherson defend welfare economics by claiming that even if welfare does not consist in preference satisfaction, preferences still provide good, if fallible, evidence of welfare. I argue that this strategy does not yet fully solve the problems for welfare economics stemming from the preference satisfaction theory of welfare. More work is needed to show that our self-interested preferences are sufficiently reliable, or in some other sense our best, evidence of well-being. Thus, my aim is to identify the challenges that remain and clarify what additional work is needed before Hausman and McPherson's defence of welfare economics succeeds.

机译：豪斯曼和麦克弗森声称，即使福利不是优先满足，福利仍然可以提供福利的良好证据，即使是易错的。我认为这种策略尚未完全解决福利偏好偏好满足理论所带来的福利经济学问题。还需要做更多的工作来证明我们的个人喜好足够可靠，或者从某种意义上说是我们幸福的最佳证据。因此，我的目的是确定仍然存在的挑战，并阐明在Hausman和McPherson的福利经济学辩护取得成功之前还需要做哪些额外的工作。

著录项

来源
《Economics & philosophy》 |2015年第1期|141-159|共19页
作者
Alexander F. Sarch;
展开▼
作者单位

Department of Philosophy, University of Southern California, 3709 Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0451, USA;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
Welfare; Well-being; Welfare economics; Preference; Self-interest;

机译：福利;福利;福利经济学;偏爱;自身利益;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. PREFERENCE SATISFACTION AND WELFARE ECONOMICS [J] . Daniel M. Hausman, Michael S. McPherson Economics & philosophy . 2009,第1期

机译：偏好满意度和福利经济学
2. Can welfare be measured with a preference-satisfaction index? [J] . van der Deijl Willem Journal of Economic Methodology . 2018,第2期

机译：可以使用偏好 - 满意度指数来衡量福利吗？
3. A multi-disciplinary framework for bio-economic modeling in aquaculture: a welfare case study. (Special Issue: The economic costs & benefits of fish welfare management.) [J] . Noble C., Berrill I. K., Waller B., Aquaculture Economics & Management . 2012,第4期

机译：水产养殖生物经济建模的多学科框架：福利案例研究。（特刊：鱼类福利管理的经济成本和收益。）
4. Effect: Information Welfare Policies on the Activation of Information Welfare and Information Satisfaction [C] . Won-geun So, Ha-kyun Kim International conference on future information technology . 2019

机译：效果：信息福利信息福利政策及信息满意度
5. A critical reappraisal of Walrasian-Paretian theory of value, distribution and welfare: In search of its relevance for economic justice as well as empirical validity. [D] . Lee, Han Yu. 1988

机译：对Walrasian-Paretian价值，分配和福利理论的批判性重新评估：寻找其与经济正义的关系以及经验有效性。
6. 306 Welfare implications of husbandry procedures impair piglets’ welfare and production and farms’ economic [O] . Liat Morgan, Beata Itina-Swartz, Lee Koren, 2019

机译：306畜牧业程序的福利造成损害仔猪福利和生产农场经济
7. Preference, Value, Choice, and Welfare, Daniel M. Hausman. Cambridge University Press, 2012, xiv + 153 pages. [O] . De Boer J.S. 2014

机译：偏好，价值，选择和福利，Daniel M. Hausman。剑桥大学出版社，2012年，第xiv + 153页。
8. Decade of Welfare Reform: What We've Learned About Welfare Usage and Economic Outcomes [R] . 2003

机译：福利改革十年：我们对福利使用和经济成果的了解

HAUSMAN AND MCPHERSON ON WELFARE ECONOMICS AND PREFERENCE SATISFACTION THEORIES OF WELFARE: A CRITICAL NOTE

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅