首页> 外文期刊>Economics & philosophy >Property rights and the right to the fruits of one's labor: jurisprudence
【24h】

Property rights and the right to the fruits of one's labor: jurisprudence

机译:财产权和劳动成果权:法理学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper provides further evidence to the argument that Smith's theory of justice did not follow the natural justice school and that subsequently the ethical position on acquiring private property is not independent of the effects which such acquisition may have on the property-less individuals. I will show that the justification for private ownership is based on "reasonable expectations" which owners of assets have with regard to the fruits of the asset. The expectation to subsist through the use of one's natural assets is equally reasonable. This is not to say that Smith believed that society should equally distribute income. But it does mean that the acquisition of private property must not interfere with the rights of individuals to subsist. Consequently, distribution is clearly an important part of Smith's conception of justice.
机译:本文为以下论点提供了进一步的证据:史密斯的正义理论没有遵循自然正义学派,并且随后关于获取私有财产的伦理立场并不独立于这种获取对无财产个体可能产生的影响。我将证明私人所有权的理由是基于资产所有者对资产成果所具有的“合理期望”。通过使用自然资产维持生存的期望是同样合理的。这并不是说史密斯相信社会应该平等地分配收入。但这确实意味着私有财产的获得不得干扰个人的生存权。因此,分配显然是史密斯的正义概念的重要组成部分。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Economics & philosophy》 |2005年第2期|p.279-289|共11页
  • 作者

    Amos Witztum;

  • 作者单位

    London Metropolitan University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 f;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号