• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Economics of innovation and new technology >Driving forces for research and development strategies: an empirical analysis based on firm-level panel data
【24h】

Driving forces for research and development strategies: an empirical analysis based on firm-level panel data

机译：研发战略的驱动力：基于公司层面面板数据的实证分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper investigates empirically different ways to organize research and develop ment (R&D) within Swiss firms. Based on a longitudinal data set comprising three cross-sections (1999, 2002, and 2005) of the Swiss Innovation Survey, four different types of R&D strategies could have been separated; firms combine in-house R&D with R&D co-operations (coop) or in-house R&D with external R&D (buy), or they conduct in-house R&D, external R&D, and R&D co-operations (mixed), or they exclusively rely on in-house R&D (make). It is the aim of this paper to understand what drive firms to go for different strategies. Based on econometric estimations controlling for correlations between the dependent variables and endogeneity among the independent variables, it was found that concepts related to the absorptive capacity, incoming spillovers, and appropriability, the importance of different knowledge sources, the competitive environ ment, costs, and skill aspects as well as technological uncertainty are essential factors to determine a firm's decision to choose a specific way to organize R&D.
机译：本文研究了在瑞士公司内部组织研究与开发（R＆D）的经验方法。根据瑞士创新调查的三个横断面（1999年，2002年和2005年）的纵向数据集，可以分离出四种不同类型的R＆D策略。公司将内部R＆D与R＆D合作（合作）相结合，或者将内部R＆D与外部R＆D（购买）相结合，或者进行内部R＆D，外部R＆D和R＆D合作（混合），或者完全依赖内部研发（制造）。本文的目的是了解驱动公司采取不同策略的原因。基于控制因变量和自变量内生性之间相关性的计量经济学估算，发现与吸收能力，传入溢出和可挪用性，不同知识来源的重要性，竞争环境，成本和技能方面以及技术不确定性是决定公司选择特定组织研发方式的决定的重要因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号