Corrigendum to 'Reconciling the Rawlsian and the utilitarian approaches to the maximization of social welfare' [Economics Letters 122(2014)439-444]

Oded Stark; Marcin Jakubek; Fryderyk Falniowski

首页> 外文期刊>Economics letters >Corrigendum to 'Reconciling the Rawlsian and the utilitarian approaches to the maximization of social welfare' [Economics Letters 122(2014)439-444]

【24h】

Corrigendum to 'Reconciling the Rawlsian and the utilitarian approaches to the maximization of social welfare' [Economics Letters 122(2014)439-444]

机译：“调和罗尔斯和功利主义方法以实现社会福利最大化”的勘误[经济快报122（2014）439-444]

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Subsection 3.1. (pp. 441-442) of the originally published article analyzes the optimal choice of a Rawlsian social planner (RSP). The originally published subsection did not cover all possible cases, and the proof that a RSP will choose to equalize incomes is incomplete. The text that follows replaces that subsection.

机译：3.1小节。最初发表的文章（pp。441-442）分析了罗尔斯社会规划师（RSP）的最佳选择。最初发布的小节并未涵盖所有可能的情况，并且RSP将选择使收入均等的证据并不完整。后面的文字替换该小节。

著录项

来源
《Economics letters》 |2014年第1期|160-161|共2页
作者
Oded Stark; Marcin Jakubek; Fryderyk Falniowski;
展开▼
作者单位

University of Bonn, Germany,University of Klagenfurt, Austria,University of Vienna, Austria,University of Warsaw, Poland,ZEF, University of Bonn, Walter-Flex-Strasse 3, D-53113 Bonn, Germany;

University of Klagenfurt, Austria;

Cracow University of Economics, Poland;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Reconciling the Rawlsian and the utilitarian approaches to the maximization of social welfare [J] . Oded Stark, Marcin Jakubek, Fryderyk Falniowski Economics letters . 2014,第3期

机译：调和罗尔斯和功利主义的方法以实现社会福利的最大化
2. Reconciling utilitarian and non-utilitarian approaches to biodiversity conservation [J] . Michel Loreau Ethics in science and environmental politics . 2014,第1期

机译：调和功利和非功利的生物多样性保护方法
3. What are the ethics of welfare economics? And, are welfare economists utilitarians? [J] . Edward R. Morey International review of economics . 2018,第2期

机译：福利经济学的伦理学是什么？而且，福利经济学家是功利主义者吗？
4. Utilitarians Without Utilities: Maximizing Social Welfare for Graph Problems Using Only Ordinal Preferences [C] . Ben Abramowitz, Elliot Anshelevich AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence;Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference;Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence . 2018

机译：没有公用事业的功利主义者：使用单个序列偏好最大化图形问题的社会福利
5. RESPONSE TO THE CATHOLIC BISHOPS' LETTER ON ECONOMIC JUSTICE: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL WELFARE (EMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL CHANGE, WASHINGTON, POVERTY) [D] . HOFF, MARIE D. 1987

机译：回应天主教比绍普斯关于经济正义的信：对社会福利的影响（就业，社会变迁，华盛顿，贫困）
6. Consumer Maximization of Utilitarian and Informational Reinforcement: Comparing Two Utility Measures with Reference to Social Class [O] . Jorge M. Oliveira-Castro, Gordon R. Foxall 2017

机译：消费者最大限度地提高实用性和信息性：参考社会阶层比较两种实用性措施
7. Reconciling the Rawlsian and the utilitarian approaches to the maximization of social welfare [O] . Stark Oded, Jakubek Marcin, Falniowski Fryderyk 2014

机译：协调罗尔斯和功利主义方法，实现社会福利最大化
8. Description of the Social and Economic Systems of the Kodiak/Shumagin Region. Social and Economic Studies Program Technical Report Number 122 [R] . Langdon, S. J. , Huskey, T. L. , Lehr, D. K. , 1986

机译：科迪亚克/舒马金地区社会经济系统描述。社会和经济研究计划技术报告第122号

Corrigendum to 'Reconciling the Rawlsian and the utilitarian approaches to the maximization of social welfare' [Economics Letters 122(2014)439-444]

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅