首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Residual injustices
【24h】

Residual injustices

机译:残留不公

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

MANY VICTIMS of war crimes dream of seeing their oppressors tried by an international court. Seeing them tried twice on the same charges, however, suggests that the court may not be running smoothly. On January 28th in The Hague, hearings will resume in the second trial of Jovica Stanisic and Franko Simatovic, two former officers of the Serbian secret police accused of masterminding ethnic cleansing in Bosnia and Croatia in the 1990s. They were acquitted in 2013. But an appeals court ruled that judges had not properly applied the doctrine of "joint criminal enterprises", which holds individual conspirators responsible for the crimes committed by their organisations, and ordered them to be tried again.
机译:战争罪的许多受害者梦想着看到他们的压迫者受到国际法院的审判。然而,看到他们以相同的罪名审判了两次,这表明法院可能无法顺利进行。 1月28日,在海牙,将对两名前塞尔维亚秘密警察的官员Jovica Stanisic和Franko Simatovic的第二次审判进行开庭审理,他们被指控策划了1990年代波斯尼亚和克罗地亚的种族清洗活动。他们在2013年被无罪释放。但上诉法院裁定,法官没有适当地运用“联合犯罪企业”的学说,该学说要求个人同谋应对其组织所犯下的罪行负责,并命令他们再受审判。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2019年第9127期|49-50|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号