首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Hold the front page!
【24h】

Hold the front page!

机译:保持首页!

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

MALCOLM X, an American political activist, described the media as the most powerful entity on Earth, "because they control the minds of the masses". Some journalists may find this proposition flattering, but though those who study such things agree newspapers exert some influence over their readers, the effect has proved devilishly difficult to quantify. Now, Gary King of Harvard University and his colleagues have measured the impact of stories from almost three dozen different news sources on the American public, as judged by the content of posts on Twitter, a microblogging service. Their study, published this week in Science, found that even stories from the news sites that formed part of the study, which were small compared with, say, the New York Times or the Washington Post, increased Twitter discussion of the issues in those stories by about 60%. They also shifted the nature of the views expressed in those tweets towards those of the published pieces.
机译:美国政治活动家MALCOLM X将媒体描述为地球上最强大的实体,“因为它们控制着大众的思想”。一些记者可能会觉得这种主张很讨人喜欢,但是尽管研究此类内容的人都同意报纸会对读者产生一些影响,但事实证明,这种效果很难量化。现在,根据微博服务Twitter上帖子内容的判断,哈佛大学的加里·金(Gary King)和他的同事们已经测量了将近三打不同新闻来源的新闻对美国公众的影响。他们的研究于本周在《科学》杂志上发表,发现即使是构成研究一部分的新闻网站中的故事,与《纽约时报》或《华盛顿邮报》相比,也很小,也增加了Twitter对这些故事中问题的讨论。减少约60%他们还将这些推文中表达的观点的本质转变为已发表文章的观点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2017年第9066期|68-69|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号