首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Diplomatic distress
【24h】

Diplomatic distress

机译:外交困境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ON NOVEMBER 21st Boris Johnson, the foreign secretary, denied in Parliament that Britain's loss of its place on the International Court of Justice (ICJ) was a failure. "It has been a long-standing objective of UK foreign policy to support India in the UN," he insisted. That Britain wilted in the face of an Indian challenge, leaving it with no judge on the court for the first time since it was founded in 1946, was thus almost a success. His answer put a creative gloss on an unhappy state of affairs. The ICJ has 15 judges; five are elected every three years for a nine-year term. Britain's candidate, Sir Christopher Greenwood, was standing for re-election, and was widely expected to win.
机译:11月21日,外交大臣鲍里斯·约翰逊(Boris Johnson)在议会上否认英国失去其在国际法院(ICJ)中的地位是失败的。他坚持认为:“支持印度加入联合国一直是英国外交政策的长期目标。”因此,英国面对印度的挑战而萎靡不振,自1946年成立以来,第一次没有法官在法庭上任职,这几乎是成功的。他的回答充满创意地掩饰了不愉快的状况。国际法院有15名法官;每三年选举五位,任期九年。英国候选人克里斯托弗·格林伍德爵士(Sir Christopher Greenwood)正当选连任,人们普遍认为他将获胜。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2017年第9068期|52-52|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号