首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Free exchange | Common sense
【24h】

Free exchange | Common sense

机译:免费交流|

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It sounds vaguely elvish, like something from the pages of Tolkien. In fact, the Charter of the Forest is one of Britain's founding political documents, dating from the same period as Magna Carta, the "Great Charter", as the Charter of Liberties was known to distinguish it from its sylvan partner. Whereas Magna Carta concerned the interests of a few privileged barons, the Charter of the Forest was intended to safeguard those of commoners—in particular, their time-honoured right to make a living from the bounty of the great wild commons. As an economic institution, the commons now seems as old-fashioned as constitutional documents sealed by noblemen in meadows. To many economists, the spread of private property rights was essential to the creation of the modern world. But the shortcomings of commons can be overstated. They could usefully be granted a place in public policy today.
机译:听起来有些模糊,就像Tolkien在书中的内容一样。实际上,《森林宪章》是英国的开创性政治文件之一,可追溯到《大宪章》的同期发行,因为众所周知《自由宪章》将其与森林伙伴区分开。 《大宪章》涉及少数特权男爵的利益,而《森林宪章》则旨在维护平民的利益,尤其是他们享有悠久历史的权利,可以从野生大公的赏金中谋生。作为一种经济机构,如今的公地看上去像老式的文件一样,由贵族在草地上盖章。对于许多经济学家来说,私有财产权的传播对于创建现代世界至关重要。但是,公地的缺点可能被夸大了。今天,可以将它们有效地授予公共政策地位。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2019年第9160期|66-66|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号