首页> 外文期刊>The economist >The perils of stakeholderism
【24h】

The perils of stakeholderism

机译:利益相关的危险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

"WHEN DID Walmart grow a conscience?" The question, W asked approvingly in a Boston Globe headline last year, would have made Milton Friedman turn in his grave. In a landmark New York Times Magazine essay, whose 50th anniversary fell on September 13th, the Nobel-prizewinning economist sought from the first paragraph to tear to shreds any notion that businesses should have social responsibilities. Employment? Discrimination? Pollution? Mere "catchwords", he declared. Only businessmen could have responsibilities. And their sole one as managers, as he saw it, was to a firm's owners, whose desires "generally will be to make as much money as possible while conforming to the basic rules of the society". It is hard to find a punchier opening set of paragraphs anywhere in the annals of business.
机译:“沃尔玛什么时候才能发展良心?”这个问题,W去年在波士顿全球标题中批准地问道,会使米尔顿弗里德曼转身在他的坟墓里。在一个地标纽约时报杂志文章中,其50周年纪念日在9月13日下跌,诺贝尔奖励经济学家从第一段寻求撕裂,撕碎任何企业应该具有社会责任的概念。就业?歧视?污染?宣布,他宣布“in​​claywords”。只有商人可以有责任。当他看到它时,他们唯一的一个人作为管理者,是一个公司的主人,他的愿望“一般将尽可能多地赚钱,同时符合社会的基本规则”。很难在业务历史上找到一组打孔器开放的段落。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2020年第9212期|62-62|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号