首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Roads less travelled
【24h】

Roads less travelled

机译:少人路

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Paying for roads in the United States was once straightforward. Petrol (gasoline) taxes, easy to administer and collect, were directed into the federal Highway Trust Fund. Those revenues were in turn distributed to the states for maintenance and investment. State petrol taxes provided further funds. And because petrol consumption was a rough proxy for road use, the system satisfied the principle that consumers should pay for a product in proportion to their use of it. That old model no longer works. First, the federal petrol tax has failed to keep pace with prices: it was last raised, to 18.4 cents per gallon (3.8 litres), 20 years ago. Most states also do not index their petrol taxes. Second, petrol taxes no longer serve as an adequate stand-in for road use. Cars are becoming increasingly fuel-efficient (see chart 1): by 2025 new vehicles must, by law, run at an average 54.5 miles per gallon (mpg).
机译:在美国,为公路付费很简单。汽油(汽油)税,易于管理和收取,直接进入联邦公路信托基金。这些收入又分配给各州进行维护和投资。州汽油税提供了进一步的资金。而且由于汽油消费是道路使用的粗略替代,该系统满足了消费者应根据产品使用比例购买产品的原则。旧的模型不再起作用。首先,联邦汽油税未能跟上价格的步伐:上一次提高至20年前的每加仑18.4美分(3.8升)。大多数州也没有为其汽油税编制索引。第二,汽油税不再是道路使用的适当替代品。汽车的燃油效率越来越高(参见表1):根据法律,到2025年,新车的平均行驶速度必须为每加仑54.5英里。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2013年第8858期|3235|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号