【24h】

Charlemagne

机译:查理曼大帝

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2005 the people of France and the Netherlands gave a stinging rebuke to the European Union by rejecting a new constitutional treaty. Seven years on, they are again causing alarm. To judge from the presidential race in France and the fall of the Dutch government this week, many are kicking against austerity. And a growing number support extremist parties of the left and right that reject the decades-old European project altogether. Tempting as it is to conflate worries about France and the Netherlands, much separates them. France is big and protectionist by instinct; the Netherlands is a small, open trader. The French have long played fast and loose with public finances; the Dutch see themselves as models of fiscal discipline. France has a powerful presidency; the Netherlands muddles through with a kaleidoscopic parliamentary system. In Paris supranational eu bodies are seen as a fetter; in The Hague the European Commission is hailed as the protector of small countries.
机译:2005年,法国和荷兰人民拒绝了一项新的宪法条约,对欧洲联盟进行了严厉的谴责。七年过去了,它们再次引起警报。从法国总统大选和本周荷兰政府倒台来看,许多人都在反对紧缩政策。越来越多的左翼和右翼极端政党完全拒绝了这个有着数十年历史的欧洲项目。诱人的做法是将对法国和荷兰的担忧混为一谈,将它们分开了。法国是大国,本能是贸易保护主义。荷兰是一个小型的开放贸易商。长期以来,法国人在公共财政方面表现得一团糟。荷兰人视自己为财政纪律的榜样。法国拥有强大的总统职位;荷兰陷入千变万化的议会制。在巴黎,超国家欧盟机构被视为束缚。在海牙,欧洲委员会被誉为小国的保护者。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2012年第8782期|p.51|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号