首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Divided and overruled?
【24h】

Divided and overruled?

机译:划分和否决?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accounting has become political. Fair-value rules, which require assets to be marked to market prices, are blamed by some for exaggerating banks' losses. Although it will take years to establish whether banks' accounts have painted too bleak a picture, the rows are already in full swing. Confidence in "efficient" market prices has been hammered, as has the principle that accounts are designed mainly for investors. The public has a big interest in banks' books now, too. "There are competing paradigms about what financial statements are for," says John Hepp of Grant Thornton, an accountancy firm.
机译:会计已成为政治。一些人指责公允价值规则夸大了银行的损失,这些规则要求资产必须按市场价格进行标记。尽管要确定银行账户是否描绘得太暗淡还需要数年的时间,但这些行已经全面展开。人们对“有效”市场价格的信心已经敲定,账户主要是为投资者设计的原则也是如此。公众现在对银行账簿也产生了极大的兴趣。会计师事务所Grant Thornton的约翰·赫普(John Hepp)说:“关于财务报表的用途存在竞争范式。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2009年第8657期|97|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号