首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Boring disciplines?
【24h】

Boring disciplines?

机译:无聊的学科?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Richard rorty, who died last year at 75, was one of the most talked-about thinkers in America. Every professional philosopher in the English-speaking world had to grapple with his magnum opus, "Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature", published in 1979. But the reason why he was a superstar is that it was not only philosophers who read him. Students and teachers in many other branches of the humanities fell under his spell. This wide appeal was partly due to his approachable style, trenchant polemics and breadth of learning. It also helped that he attacked philosophy as a puffed-up pretender with no monopoly on deep truths.
机译:理查德·罗蒂(Richard rorty)于去年去世,享年75岁。他是美国最受关注的思想家之一。讲英语的世界上每个职业哲学家都必须努力应对他的巨著,《哲学与自然之镜》,该书于1979年出版。但是,他之所以成为超级巨星,是因为不仅阅读他的是哲学家。人文学科其他许多部门的学生和老师都受他的吸引。这种广泛的吸引力部分是由于他平易近人的风格,鲜明的辩论和学习的广度。这也有助于他以philosophy肿的伪装者抨击哲学,对深层的真理不抱任何垄断。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2008年第8584期|107-108|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号