首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Should reform be faster or steadier?
【24h】

Should reform be faster or steadier?

机译:改革应该更快还是更稳定?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

After two years of unsuccessful negoti-ations, the South African authorities are poised to expropriate a white-owned farm in the North West province. But in case this sounds like the start of a horror tale that might replicate events in neighbouring Zimbabwe, rest assured. In this instance the expropriation is definitely legal and the farmer will be fairly compensated. In May, the constitutional court made it clear that land grabs will not be tolerated. And yet, however orderly, there is growing black frustration over the slow pace of land reform. For land is still an emotive and politically explosive issue.
机译:经过两年失败的谈判,南非当局准备没收西北省的一个白人拥有的农场。但是,如果这听起来像是一个恐怖故事的开始,可能会在邻近的津巴布韦复制事件,请放心。在这种情况下,征收绝对是合法的,农民将得到公平的补偿。五月份,宪法法院明确表示将不容忍土地掠夺。然而,不管土地秩序如何有序,由于土地改革步伐缓慢,人们越来越感到沮丧。因为土地仍然是一个具有情感和政治意义的爆炸性问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号