首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Dons bring in the dough
【24h】

Dons bring in the dough

机译:堂堂生面团

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The government's plans to reform university funding are being criticised as creeping privatisation. It's happening anyway. Britain's universities straddle two worlds. One consists of full-time undergraduate courses, mainly filled by British students, with costs subsidised (but only partly) by the state. It is depressingly threadbare, overcrowded and politicised. There is government interference galore: to take more poor students in the name of social engineering, to promote particular subjects and courses to meet planners' priorities. Success comes when wily bureaucrats outwit the rulemakers. It reeks of the Soviet planned economy. The other world is of competition, for staff, students and research money. It is the world of mobile, flexible, go-ahead academics; of foreign, part-time and postgraduate students who have backed their choice of course with their own money, and expect value for it; of private businesses sponsoring research that they think will boost their profits. It is a much more dynamic, tougher but more cheerful place. Advancement comes through excellence, hard work, and ingenuity.
机译:政府改革大学经费的计划被批评为私有化的蔓延。无论如何都在发生。英国的大学跨越两个世界。其中一门课程由全日制本科课程组成,主要由英国学生提供,费用由国家资助(但仅部分补贴)。令人沮丧的混乱局面,拥挤不堪和政治化。政府大肆干预:以社会工程学的名义招募更多贫困学生,推广特定学科和课程,以满足计划者的优先考虑。当狡猾的官僚胜过决策者时,成功就来了。它看起来像苏联的计划经济。另一个世界竞争激烈,争夺员工,学生和研究经费。它是流动的,灵活的,超前的学者的世界;外国,非全日制和研究生用自己的钱来支持自己的课程选择,并期望为此付出代价;他们认为将增加利润的私人企业赞助研究。这是一个充满活力,更艰难但更令人愉悦的地方。进步来自卓越,努力和独创。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号