• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>EContent >To Search or Not to Search: That is the Query
【24h】

To Search or Not to Search: That is the Query

机译：搜索还是不搜索：这就是查询

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Maybe it's because I have always had more stuff on my PCs than most of my peers, and as such, I have trouble finding things, that I was a very early adopter of desktop search. I really loved a $99 product called QuickFind from a small company named Softscape. I found it so useful that I wrote a review of it in 1998. QuickFind indexed and found all major files you created on your PC. In those days, "networking" meant "dial-up," and my home PC was essentially standalone. PC viruses were almost unheard of. You found worms only in your garden and Trojan horses were the stuff of Greek mythology. After using QuickFind and writing the aforementioned review, I installed it on a networked PC at work—not a good idea. Soon that PC became unreliable and a Softscape representative had to guide me through PC brain surgery. Sometime later, Softscape changed directions and dropped the QuickFind product line. I don't know whether that was because of incidents like mine or if the market just wasn't ready for desktop search.
机译：也许是因为我的PC上总是比大多数同类产品拥有更多的东西，因此，我很难找到东西，所以我很早就采用了桌面搜索。我真的很喜欢一家名为Softscape的小公司的售价为99美元的产品QuickFind。我发现它很有用，以至于我在1998年对其进行了评论。QuickFind编制了索引，并找到了您在PC上创建的所有主要文件。在那些日子里，“网络”意味着“拨号”，而我的家用PC本质上是独立的。 PC病毒几乎闻所未闻。您只在花园里发现蠕虫，而特洛伊木马是希腊神话中的东西。使用QuickFind并编写了上述评论后，我将其安装在工作中的网络PC上-这不是一个好主意。 PC很快变得不可靠，Softscape代表不得不指导我进行PC脑外科手术。稍后，Softscape改变了方向，并放弃了QuickFind产品线。我不知道这是因为像我这样的事件，还是因为市场还没有准备好进行桌面搜索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号