首页> 外文期刊>The Electronic Library >The evaluation of New Zealand academic library OPACs: a checklist approach
【24h】

The evaluation of New Zealand academic library OPACs: a checklist approach

机译:新西兰大学图书馆OPAC的评估:清单方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the usability features of online public access catalogues (OPACs) in New Zealand academic libraries. It also makes a comparison of how libraries using the same library software are customizing their interfaces to make them useful to their users. Design/methodology/approach - The interface/usability features of 13 academic library OPACs in New Zealand are analyzed using a usability inspection evaluation method. More specifically, the paper uses a modified checklist based on the checklists of Cherry et al. and Ibrahim. Findings - Most OPACs in the paper sample receive high scores in the areas of bibliographic display, text, layout, labels, and user assistance. Many new features that are associated with search engines such as word cloud, faceted navigation, the most popular ranking and related items are however, not found in the surveyed OPACs. OPACs built on the Voyager library systems on average, score higher in most feature categories in the checklist. Features found in the OPACs during the evaluation that are not part of the checklist are noted and recommended for inclusion in future evaluation checklists.rnOriginality/value - Findings from the research will be of interest to not only researchers and practitioners in the field of library and information science in New Zealand, but also in other countries as the sample in this research include OPACs built on library software such as Voyager or Liberty3 that are used in many other countries.
机译:目的-本文的目的是调查新西兰学术图书馆中的在线公共访问目录(OPAC)的可用性功能。它还比较了使用相同库软件的库如何自定义其接口以使其对用户有用。设计/方法/方法-使用可用性检查评估方法分析了新西兰13个学术图书馆OPAC的界面/可用性功能。更具体地说,本文基于Cherry等人的清单使用了经过修改的清单。和易卜拉欣。调查结果-纸本样本中的大多数OPAC在书目显示,文本,布局,标签和用户帮助方面均获得高分。但是,在调查的OPAC中找不到与搜索引擎相关的许多新功能,例如词云,分面导航,最受欢迎的排名和相关项目。平均而言,基于Voyager库系统构建的OPAC在清单中的大多数功能类别中得分较高。评估时建议在OPAC中发现的不属于检查清单的功能,并建议将这些功能包括在以后的评估检查清单中。rn原创性/价值-研究结果不仅会受到图书馆和图书馆领域研究人员和从业人员的关注。新西兰的信息科学,也包括其他国家/地区的信息科学,该研究的样本包括建立在许多其他国家/地区使用的基于图书馆软件(例如Voyager或Liberty3)的OPAC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号