...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Comparing the energy implications of FRP and concrete residential construction in a hot arid climate
【24h】

Comparing the energy implications of FRP and concrete residential construction in a hot arid climate

机译:比较干旱气候下玻璃钢和混凝土住宅建筑的能源影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Housing prices in Israel have become exceptionally prohibitive, and this includes single family housing. Conventional construction is mainly cement and concrete based, and this has significant negative impacts on cost, time and environment. Can modern industrialized processes and materials alleviate such issues? This paper compares a conventional cement concrete residential building with one made of Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composite material. It assesses the relative advantages of each one in terms of overall energy implications during their life cycle. Results show that the FRP house has an advantage of higher thermal resistance, which leads to lower energy consumption during cold periods of the year. Onsite erection time savings is another significant advantage price-wise. Low thermal mass of the FRP option is a disadvantage that makes it more energy consuming during summer. The main disadvantage is the noticeably higher Embodied Energy (EE) of the FRP in the production phase (cradle-to-gate) in comparison to the parallel concrete house EE for the same phase. The main tools used were EnergyPlus for thermal simulations and Simapro for LCEA. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:以色列的住房价格已变得异常高昂,其中包括单身家庭住房。常规建筑主要以水泥和混凝土为基础,这会对成本,时间和环境产生重大不利影响。现代工业化工艺和材料能否缓解此类问题?本文将传统的水泥混凝土住宅楼与由纤维增强聚合物(FRP)复合材料制成的住宅楼进行了比较。它评估了每个人在其生命周期中的总体能量影响方面的相对优势。结果表明,FRP房屋具有较高的热阻优势,从而可在一年的寒冷时期降低能耗。在价格上,节省现场安装时间是另一个重要优势。 FRP选件的热质量低是一个缺点,使其在夏季消耗更多的能量。主要缺点是,与同一阶段的平行混凝土房屋EE相比,FRP在生产阶段(从摇篮到大门)的显着能量(EE)更高。使用的主要工具是用于热模拟的EnergyPlus和用于LCEA的Simapro。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号