...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Development of criteria for ecological evaluation of private residential lots in urban areas
【24h】

Development of criteria for ecological evaluation of private residential lots in urban areas

机译：制定城市私人住宅区生态评价标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Single-family residential sector comes to the forefront in consideration of inefficient land use in urban areas. A lack of legislation, planning and evaluation reflects negatively on urban ecosystems, environment, natural balance and quality of life, and contributes to land deficiency. On the other hand, conditions on wider location and lot itself play significant role in achieving good ecological quality of residential unit and, further, of urban area in general. Formation of criteria for ecological evaluation of urban residential lots was proposed as a solution to this duality, and methodological path leading to criteria development was described. General methodology was then applied on two examples: cities Belgrade and Ljubljana, and resulting criteria were established for both. Local specificities manifested in variations among two proposals. Oppositely, common issues allowed the application of criteria in both cases. Beside the fact that evaluation systems designed for local level tackle local problems in the most comprehensive way, comparison showed that, while it is possible to apply criteria developed for Belgrade area in Ljubljana case, there exist major constraints in the immediate application of criteria proposed for Ljubljana area in Belgrade case, due to significant variations in reached overall (sustainable) urban development level. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译：考虑到城市地区土地利用效率低下，单户住宅领域走在前列。缺乏立法，规划和评估，不利于城市生态系统，环境，自然平衡和生活质量，并导致土地短缺。另一方面，更广泛的位置和地段本身的条件对于实现住宅单元以及整个城市的良好生态质量起着重要作用。提出了形成城市居民区生态评价标准的方法，以解决这种双重性，并描述了导致标准制定的方法路径。然后将通用方法应用于两个示例：贝尔格莱德市和卢布尔雅那市，并为两者建立了最终的标准。地方特色体现在两个提案之间。相反，常见问题允许在两种情况下都应用标准。比较表明，为地方一级设计的评估系统可以最全面地解决当地问题，比较结果表明，虽然可以适用卢布尔雅那案例中为贝尔格莱德地区制定的标准，但立即采用建议的标准存在很大的限制。贝尔格莱德的卢布尔雅那地区，由于达到总体（可持续）城市发展水平的重大差异。 （C）2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号