Performance comparison of SOFC integrated combined power systems with three different bottoming steam turbine cycles

Sarmah Pranjal; Gogoi T. K.

首页> 外文期刊>Energy Conversion & Management >Performance comparison of SOFC integrated combined power systems with three different bottoming steam turbine cycles

【24h】

Performance comparison of SOFC integrated combined power systems with three different bottoming steam turbine cycles

机译：SOFC集成式联合动力系统在三种不同的底部汽轮机循环中的性能比较

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

In this article, a thermodynamic model is developed for analyzing the energetic and exergetic performance of a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) integrated combined power system with triple pressure reheat cycle in the bottoming steam turbine (ST) plant. A temperature difference range of 15-20 degrees C is considered between flue gas and steam at superheater inlet in the high and intermediate pressure stages of the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). Also, a temperature difference of 20 degrees C is maintained at the pinch point between flue gas and saturated water in the low pressure stage of the HRSG, Detail performance variation is provided as a function of compressor pressure ratio (CPR) showing that the system's power and efficiency increase while total irreversibility decreases at higher CPR. Further, thermodynamic modeling is done for two other systems with dual pressure reheat and single pressure ST cycles for performance comparison amongst all, under identical conditions. The comparative study shows that the system with single pressure ST cycle performs better compared to the others; the highest power is obtained from this system with minimum total irreversibility, It is recommended that the system with single pressure ST cycle would be the most appropriate as it is simple with less number of components and minimum total cost. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

机译：在本文中，开发了一个热力学模型，用于分析底部汽轮机（ST）厂中具有三重压力再热循环的固体氧化物燃料电池（SOFC）集成式联合动力系统的能量和能量性能。在热回收蒸汽发生器（HRSG）的高压和中压级中，过热器入口处的烟道气与蒸汽之间的温度差范围为15-20摄氏度。此外，在HRSG的低压阶段，烟气与饱和水之间的夹点处保持20摄氏度的温差。详细性能变化随压缩机压力比（CPR）的变化而变化，表明系统的功率CPR较高时，效率提高，而总不可逆性降低。此外，还对其他两个具有双压力再加热和单压力ST循环的系统进行了热力学建模，以便在相同条件下进行所有系统之间的性能比较。对比研究表明，单压力ST循环系统的性能优于其他系统。从该系统获得的最大功率具有最小的总不可逆性。建议采用单压力ST循环的系统是最合适的，因为它简单易用，部件数量少，总成本最低。（C）2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

来源
《Energy Conversion & Management》 |2017年第1期|91-101|共11页
作者
Sarmah Pranjal; Gogoi T. K.;
展开▼
作者单位

Dibrugarh Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Dibrugarh, Assam, India;

Tezpur Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Tezpur, India;

展开▼
收录信息美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
Energy and exergy; SOFC; Gas turbine; Steam turbine; Combined power cycle;

机译：能源与火用SOFC燃气轮机蒸汽轮机联合动力循环;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Performance improvement of the bottoming steam Rankine cycle (SRC) and organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems for a triple combined system using gas turbine (GT) as topping cycle [J] . Kose Ozkan, Koc Yildiz, Yagli Huseyin Energy Conversion & Management . 2020,第May期

机译：使用燃气轮机（GT）作为顶部循环的三重组合系统的底部蒸汽Quanque循环（SRC）和有机朗肯循环（ORC）系统的性能改进
2. Design, Thermodynamic Performance Comparison and Cost Analysis of Photovoltaic (PV), Concentrated Solar Power (CSP), Wind Turbine, Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC), and Integrated Solar Combined Cycle (ISCC) Power Plants [J] . Peter Jenkins, Gowtham Ramamoorthy Energy and power engineering . 2020,第6期

机译：光伏（PV），集中太阳能电力（CSP），风力涡轮机，天然气组合循环（NGCC）和集成太阳能组合循环（ISCC）发电厂的设计，热力学性能比较和成本分析
3. Design, Thermodynamic Performance Comparison and Cost Analysis of Photovoltaic (PV), Concentrated Solar Power (CSP), Wind Turbine, Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC), and Integrated Solar Combined Cycle (ISCC) Power Plants [J] . Peter Jenkins, Gowtham Ramamoorthy Energy and power engineering . 2020,第6期

机译：光伏（PV），集中太阳能电力（CSP），风力涡轮机，天然气组合循环（NGCC）和集成太阳能组合循环（ISCC）发电厂的设计，热力学性能比较和成本分析
4. Simulation of Advanced SOFC Power Plants with Gas and Steam Turbine Cycles on the Basis of Integrated Coal Gasification (IGFC) [C] . Ahmet Lokurlu, Rudolf Pruschek European solid oxide fuel cell forum . 2000

机译：基于整体煤气化（IGFC）的具有燃气和蒸汽轮机循环的先进SOFC电厂的仿真
5. PHASED CONSTRUCTION OF INTEGRATED COAL GASIFICATION COMBINED-CYCLE POWER PLANTS (GAS TURBINES, STEAM TURBINES). [D] . ERBES, MICHAEL ROBERT. 1987

机译：一体化煤气化联合循环电厂（燃气轮机，蒸汽轮机）的分期建设。
6. Comparative Evaluation of Integrated Waste Heat Utilization Systems for Coal-Fired Power Plants Based on In-Depth Boiler-Turbine Integration and Organic Rankine Cycle [O] . Shengwei Huang, Chengzhou Li, Tianyu Tan, 2018

机译：基于深入锅炉 - 汽轮机集成和有机朗肯循环的燃煤发电厂综合废热利用系统对比较评价
7. Design, Thermodynamic Performance Comparison and Cost Analysis of Photovoltaic (PV), Concentrated Solar Power (CSP), Wind Turbine, Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC), and Integrated Solar Combined Cycle (ISCC) Power Plants [O] . Peter Jenkins, Gowtham Ramamoorthy 2020

机译：光伏（PV），集中太阳能电力（CSP），风力涡轮机，天然气组合循环（NGCC）和集成太阳能组合循环（ISCC）发电厂的设计，热力学性能比较和成本分析
8. Comparison of Integrated Gasifier-Combined Cycle and AFB-Steam Turbine Systems for Industrial Cogeneration [R] . Nainiger, J. J., Abbott, J. M., Burns, R. K. 1981

机译：综合气化炉 - 联合循环和aFB-汽轮机系统在工业热电联产中的比较

Performance comparison of SOFC integrated combined power systems with three different bottoming steam turbine cycles

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅