...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Conversion & Management >From on-road trial evaluation of electric and conventional bicycles to comparison with other urban transport modes: Case study in the city of Lisbon, Portugal
【24h】

From on-road trial evaluation of electric and conventional bicycles to comparison with other urban transport modes: Case study in the city of Lisbon, Portugal

机译：从电动自行车和常规自行车的道路试用评估到与其他城市交通方式的比较：葡萄牙里斯本市的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Increasing energy costs, energy consumption and emissions profiles prompted the promotion of different transportation alternatives. This research work addresses the comparison of trip dynamics, energy consumption, CO_2 and NO_X Well-to-Wheel impacts of 5 transportation alternatives (conventional and electric bicycles, conventional and electric vehicles and an urban bus) in Lisbon, Portugal. On-road monitoring of a specific route in Lisbon revealed that bikers using electric bicycles increased their average speed between 8% and 26% compared to their use of the conventional bicycle, especially in the route sections with positive slopes (up to 49% increases). Electric bicycles result in a Tank-to-Wheel energy consumption of 0.028 MJ/km, allowing an average autonomy of 46 km between recharging. When comparing the 5 transportation alternatives, the electric bicycles presented a higher travel time of 13.5%, 1.9% and 7.8% over the bus, low powered electric vehicle, and standard electric vehicle/conventional technologies, respectively. Regarding the Well-to-Wheel energy consumption analysis, the results indicated that, when compared to the other transportation solutions, the electric bicycle only uses 11%, 3%, 1%, 2% and 4% of the energy required when using the low powered electric vehicle, standard electric vehicle, conventional gasoline and diesel technologies and bus, respectively. Furthermore, the analysis of Well-to-Wheel emissions reveals that the electric bicycle has 13% and 4% lower CO_2 emissions and 12% and 4% lower NO_x emissions when compared to the low powered and standard electric vehicles, respectively. This research work allows sustaining that bicycles can be considered interesting solutions for urban trips, with comparable trip times to other transportation modes, as well as zero local emissions and reduced Well-to-Wheel pollutant impacts, contributing significantly for the improvement of the overall urban air quality.
机译：能源成本，能源消耗和排放概况的不断增长促使人们推广了不同的交通方式。这项研究工作旨在比较葡萄牙里斯本5种交通替代方案（常规和电动自行车，常规和电动车辆以及城市公交车）的出行动力学，能耗，CO_2和NO_X对轮对车的影响。对里斯本特定路线的公路监控显示，与传统自行车相比，使用电动自行车的骑车人的平均速度提高了8％至26％，特别是在具有正坡度的路段（提高了49％） 。电动自行车的油轮对轮胎的能耗为0.028 MJ / km，充电之间的平均自主时间为46 km。在比较5种交通方式时，电动自行车的行驶时间分别比公交车，低功率电动汽车和标准电动汽车/传统技术高出13.5％，1.9％和7.8％。关于“轮到车轮”能耗分析，结果表明，与其他运输解决方案相比，电动自行车仅消耗11％，3％，1％，2％和4％的能量。低功率电动汽车，标准电动汽车，常规汽油和柴油技术以及公共汽车。此外，对轮到轮胎排放的分析表明，与低功率和标准电动汽车相比，电动自行车的CO_2排放量分别降低了13％和4％，NO_x排放量分别降低了12％和4％。这项研究工作可以维持自行车可以被认为是城市出行的有趣解决方案，其出行时间可与其他交通方式相提并论，零本地排放和减少的Well-to-Wheel污染物影响，为改善整个城市发展做出了重要贡献空气质量。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Conversion & Management》 |2015年第3期|10-18|共9页
  • 作者

    Patricia Baptista; Andre Pina; Goncalo Duarte; Catarina Rolim; Goncalo Pereira; Carlos Silva; Tiago Farias;

  • 作者单位

    LAETA, IDMEC, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal,IDMEC/IST, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Av. Rovisco Pais, Pav. Mecanica I, 2° Andar, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal;

    IN+, Center for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal;

    LAETA, IDMEC, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal;

    LAETA, IDMEC, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal;

    IN+, Center for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal;

    IN+, Center for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal;

    LAETA, IDMEC, Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Urban mobility; Electric and conventional bicycles; Energy consumption and emissions; Transport modes comparison;

    机译：城市交通;电动和传统自行车;能源消耗和排放;运输方式比较;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号