...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >Returns to damage under undesirable congestion and damages to return under desirable congestion measured by DEA environmental assessment with multiplier restriction: Economic and energy planning for social sustainability in China
【24h】

Returns to damage under undesirable congestion and damages to return under desirable congestion measured by DEA environmental assessment with multiplier restriction: Economic and energy planning for social sustainability in China

机译:通过DEA环境评估(乘数限制)测量的不良拥堵下的损害回报和理想拥堵下的损失回报:中国社会可持续发展的经济和能源规划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study discusses the concept of natural and managerial disposability from their economic and methodological implications on social sustainability development. Then, it explores their analytical linkages to a concept on "congestion." The concept is classified into Undesirable Congestion (UC) under natural disposability and Desirable Congestion (DC) under managerial disposability. Considering the two disposability concepts, this study compares between Returns to Damage (RTD) under UC and Damages to Return (DTR) under DC Conceptually, UC and DC are conceptually different from RTD and DTR although they are closely related to each other group. An occurrence of the former measures is identified by a single negative multiplier (i.e. dual variable). In contrast, the latter measures are associated with multiple negative multipliers and an intercept of a supporting hyperplane on a production and pollution possibility set. Thus, an occurrence of UC and DC is a necessary condition, but not a sufficient condition on RTD and DTR, respectively, in terms of the number of negative multipliers on production factors. To document the practicality of the proposed, approach, this study applies it to Chinese economic and environmental assessment for its economic and energy planning for social sustainability development. This study identifies four important findings: First, the Chinese government has historically paid attention to the economic prosperity, but not paying serious attention on the environmental pollution (e.g., air pollution). Second, there was an increasing trend in improving the two components (Le., economic and environmental performance measures) regarding social sustainability. Third, China's economic and energy policy concerns have been focused upon well-developed municipalities (e.g., Beijing and Shanghai) and large provinces. Therefore, it is an important strategy for the government to allocate economic and energy resources to other provinces so that China can reduce the industrial and regional imbalances. As a result, China can enhance the level of social sustainability. Finally, the municipalities need strict regulation on traffic control in these metropolitan areas and a fuel mix shift from coal combustion to natural gas and renewable energies (e.g., solar, water, and nuclear generations). The fuel mix strategy, along with the structure change (e.g., from manufacturing to service and from public to private energy firms), will be a major industrial policy issue for China in near future. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究从对社会可持续发展的经济和方法论意义上讨论了自然和管理可处置性的概念。然后,它探讨了它们与“拥塞”概念的分析联系。在自然可处置性下,此概念分为不期望的拥塞(UC);在管理性可处置性下,该概念分为期望的拥塞(DC)。考虑到两个一次性概念,本研究比较了UC的损害赔偿(RTD)和DC的损害赔偿(DTR)在概念上,虽然UC和DC与彼此密切相关,但它们在概念上不同于RTD和DTR。前一个措施的发生是通过单个负乘数(即双变量)来确定的。相比之下,后一种措施与多个负乘数以及生产和污染可能性集上支撑超平面的拦截有关。因此,就生产因子的负乘数而言,UC和DC的出现分别是RTD和DTR的必要条件,但不是充分条件。为了证明所提出方法的实用性,本研究将其应用于中国经济和环境评估,以进行社会可持续发展的经济和能源规划。这项研究发现了四个重要发现:首先,中国政府历来关注经济繁荣,但并未重视环境污染(例如空气污染)。其次,在改善社会可持续性的两个组成部分(如经济和环境绩效指标)方面,趋势呈上升趋势。第三,中国对经济和能源政策的关注集中在发达的城市(例如北京和上海)和大省。因此,将政府的经济和能源资源分配给其他省份,以减少中国的工业和地区失衡状况,是政府的一项重要战略。结果,中国可以提高社会可持续性水平。最后,市政当局需要对这些大都市地区的交通管制进行严格的监管,并且燃料组合将从燃煤转向天然气和可再生能源(例如太阳能,水和核能发电)。燃料混合战略以及结构的变化(例如从制造到服务业,从公共到私人能源公司的变化)将成为中国近期的主要工业政策问题。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号