...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Approval procedures for large-scale renewable energy installations: Comparison of national legal frameworks in Japan, New Zealand, the EU and the US
【24h】

Approval procedures for large-scale renewable energy installations: Comparison of national legal frameworks in Japan, New Zealand, the EU and the US

机译：大规模可再生能源装置的批准程序：日本，新西兰，欧盟和美国的国家法律框架比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper analyses the commonalities and variances of environmental approval procedures in four OECD territories, Japan, New Zealand (NZ), the European Union (EU), and the United States (US). In order to streamline regulatory approval frameworks for large-scale renewable energy (LS-RE) installations, outlining the strengths, as well as the weaknesses of the current systems in place, is crucial in determining what components to alter in line with national and regional particularities. The jurisdictional juxtaposition facilitates the identification of administrative burdens, which could increase environmental review-related costs for developers and prolong the entire approval process. Environmental impact assessment (EIA) frameworks, a major component of the LS-RE approval process, suffer from administrative fracturing between the local, regional, and national levels as well as between various government agencies. In combination with strong reservations from local civil society stakeholders, the results revealed some of the flaws of the current LS-RE project approval systems in place. The EIA frameworks and reform efforts in all four jurisdictions illustrate the importance of consolidated and comprehensive frameworks to reduce the amount of planning uncertainties for developers. Utilising regulatory tools such as mandatory timeframes, scoping, clear screening thresholds and priority assessment categories for LS-RE projects, could result in robust EIA processes based on unified regulatory procedures for climate change mitigating energy projects, inside as well as outside of OECD jurisdictions.
机译：本文分析了四个经合组织地区（日本，新西兰（NZ），欧盟（EU）和美国（US））中环境审批程序的共性和差异。为了简化大型可再生能源（LS-RE）装置的监管批准框架，概述现有系统的优点和缺点，对于确定根据国家和地区来更改哪些组件至关重要特殊性。司法管辖区的并置有助于确定行政负担，这可能会增加开发商的环境审查相关成本，并延长整个审批流程。作为LS-RE批准流程的主要组成部分，环境影响评估（EIA）框架在地方，区域和国家级别以及各个政府机构之间遭受行政管理的折磨。结合当地民间社会利益相关者的强烈保留，结果揭示了现有的LS-RE项目审批系统存在的一些缺陷。所有四个辖区的EIA框架和改革努力都表明，合并和综合框架对于减少开发商的规划不确定性的重要性。利用诸如强制性时间表，范围界定，明确的筛选阈值和LS-RE项目优先评估类别之类的监管工具，可以基于针对减缓能源项目的统一监管程序，在OECD内部和外部进行强大的EIA流程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号