...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >A comparative study of energy consumption and efficiency of Japanese and Chinese manufacturing industry
【24h】

A comparative study of energy consumption and efficiency of Japanese and Chinese manufacturing industry

机译：日中制造业的能源消耗与效率比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The industrial sector consumes about 50% of the world's delivered energy and thus has a large impact on the world's energy production and consumption. Japan is one of the leading countries in industrial efficiency while China is the world's largest industrial energy consumer. This study analyzes the energy consumption and efficiency of the Japanese and Chinese manufacturing industry. Analysis shows that the energy intensity of both Japanese and Chinese manufacturing industry has decreased significantly. Decomposition analysis shows that the efficiency effect played an important role in reducing energy intensity; improvement of the energy efficiency of both Japanese and Chinese manufacturing industry showed a trend of exponential decay. Structural effect significantly reduced the energy intensity of the Japanese manufacturing industry while having a relatively small influence on the energy intensity of the Chinese manufacturing industry. Our analysis also shows a strong association of industrial energy efficiency improvement with energy policies, highlighting that energy efficiency policies can play an important role in the reduction of industrial energy intensity. The results of this study also underscore the important, yet very challenging, task of achieving structural change to further improve efficiency.
机译：工业部门消耗了全球约50％的已交付能源，因此对世界能源生产和消费产生了重大影响。日本是工业效率领先的国家之一，而中国则是世界上最大的工业能源消费国。这项研究分析了日本和中国制造业的能源消耗和效率。分析表明，日中两国制造业的能源强度均已明显下降。分解分析表明，效率效应在降低能量强度中起重要作用。日中两国制造业能源效率的提高都呈现出指数衰减的趋势。结构效应显着降低了日本制造业的能源强度，同时对中国制造业的能源强度影响相对较小。我们的分析还表明，工业能源效率的提高与能源政策之间有着密切的联系，突显了能源效率政策可以在降低工业能源强度方面发挥重要作用。这项研究的结果还强调了实现结构变革以进一步提高效率的重要但非常具有挑战性的任务。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2014年第7期|45-56|共12页
  • 作者

    Yue Zhao; Jing Ke; Chun Chun Ni; Michael McNeil; Nina Zheng Khanna; Nan Zhou; David Fridley; Qiqiang Li;

  • 作者单位

    School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Ding 11 Xueyuan Road, Beijing 100083, PR China;

    Energy Analysis and Environmental Impacts Department, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,MS 90R2002,1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;

    Energy Analysis and Environmental Impacts Department, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,MS 90R2002,1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;

    Energy Analysis and Environmental Impacts Department, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,MS 90R2002,1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;

    Energy Analysis and Environmental Impacts Department, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,MS 90R2002,1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;

    Energy Analysis and Environmental Impacts Department, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,MS 90R2002,1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;

    Energy Analysis and Environmental Impacts Department, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,MS 90R2002,1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;

    School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, 73 jingshi Road, Jinan, Shandong 250061, PR China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Industry; Energy efficiency; Energy policies;

    机译：行业;能源效率;能源政策;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号