...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Stimulating R&D of industrial energy-efficient technology. Policy lessons―impulse technology
【24h】

Stimulating R&D of industrial energy-efficient technology. Policy lessons―impulse technology

机译：促进工业节能技术的研发。政策课-冲动技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Stimulating research and development (R&D) of innovative energy-efficient technologies for industry is an attractive option for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Impulse technology, an innovative papermaking technology, is always included in studies assessing the long-term potential of industrial energy efficiency. Aim of this article is to analyse the R&D trajectory of impulse technology in order to explore how government can stimulate the development of industrial energy-efficient technology. The concept of 'momentum' is used to characterise the network of actors and to understand the effect of government R&D support in this particular ease study. The network analysis convincingly shows that although marketed as an energy-efficient technology, other benefits were in fact driving forces. Researchers at various national pulp & paper research institutes were successful in attracting government R&D support by claiming an improved energy efficiency. The momentum of the technology network was modest between 1980 and 1990. Therefore, government R&D support accelerated the development of impulse technology in this period. However, when the perspectives of the technology deteriorated ―momentum decreased―researchers at national research institutes continued to attract governmenl R&D support successfully. But 25 years of R&D―and over 15 years government R&D ―support have not yet resulted in a proven technology. The case study illustrates the risk of continuing R&D support too long without taking into account actors' drivers to invest in R&D. Once momentum decreased, government should have been more circumspect in evaluating the (energy efficiency) promise of impulse technology. The major policy lesson is that government has to look beyond claimed energy efficiencies; government has to value (qualitative) information on (changing) technology networks in deciding upon starting, continuing or pulling out financial R&D support to industrial energy-efficient technology.
机译：刺激创新的工业节能技术的研究与开发是减少温室气体排放的有吸引力的选择。脉冲技术是一种创新的造纸技术，始终被包括在评估工业能源效率的长期潜力的研究中。本文的目的是分析脉冲技术的研发轨迹，以探索政府如何刺激工业节能技术的发展。 “动量”的概念用于表征行为者的网络，并了解政府在此特殊性研究中对R＆D支持的效果。网络分析令人信服地表明，尽管以节能技术的形式销售，但其他好处实际上是驱动力。各个国家制浆造纸研究机构的研究人员声称提高了能源效率，成功地吸引了政府的研发支持。在1980年至1990年期间，技术网络的发展势头很小。因此，在此期间，政府的研发支持加速了脉冲技术的发展。但是，当技术前景恶化时，动量减少了，国家研究机构的研究人员继续成功地吸引了政府的研发支持。但是25年的研发（以及超过15年的政府研发）支持尚未产生成熟的技术。案例研究说明了在不考虑参与者推动研发投资的因素的情况下，持续提供研发支持的风险过长。一旦动力减弱，政府应该在评估脉冲技术的（能源效率）承诺方面更加谨慎。主要的政策教训是，政府必须超越宣称的能源效率。政府在决定启动，继续或退出对工业节能技术的金融研发支持时，必须重视（不断变化的）技术网络上的（定性）信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号