首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >New Challenge To EPA 'Flow' Limits Revives Debate Over Stormwater
【24h】

New Challenge To EPA 'Flow' Limits Revives Debate Over Stormwater

机译:EPA“流量”限制的新挑战恢复了关于雨水的辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A Vermont city's challenge to an EPA-approved waterbody cleanup plan that limits the rate at which stormwater can flow into a stream is reviving the legal debate over whether the agency can use flow as a surrogate for reducing sediment and other runoff-borne pollution, following a 2013 district court ruling that found such controls violate the Clean Water Act (CWA). In a complaint filed Feb. 18 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont, the city of Rutland, VT, argues that EPA exceeded its authority by approving a 2009 total maximum daily load (TMDL) cleanup plan for the nearby Moon Brook because it includes flow limits. The complaint is available on InsideEPA.com. See page 2 for details. (Doc. ID: 179169) "At the time of this filing, there is no statute, regulation, or guidance granting EPA the authority to issue or approve flow TMDLs.... Rutland hereby challenges EPA's effort to unilaterally expand its regulatory power from its CWA-authorized role of establishing TMDLs that limit 'pollutant' discharges in order to meet water quality standards, to control the quantity, or flow of a non-pollutant: water itself," the complaint says.
机译:佛蒙特州城市对EPA批准的限制水体流入速度的水体清洁计划的挑战使有关该机构是否可以使用水流作为替代物来减少沉积物和其他径流污染的法律辩论重新开始2013年地方法院的一项裁定,发现此类控制违反了《清洁水法》(CWA)。佛蒙特州拉特兰市在2月18日向美国佛蒙特州地区法院提起的申诉中说,EPA批准了附近的Moon Brook的2009年总最大日负荷(TMDL)清理计划,超出了其权限。它包括流量限制。该投诉可在InsideEPA.com上找到。有关详细信息,请参见第2页。 (文档ID:179169)“在提交本文档时,尚无任何法规,法规或指南授予EPA颁发或批准流量TMDL的权利。...Rutland在此挑战EPA努力单方面扩展其监管权力的努力。该投诉得到了CWA的授权,其作用是建立限制“污染物”排放的TMDL,以达到水质标准,控制非污染物的数量或流量:水本身。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号