• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >EPA Critics Float New Strategy To Challenge Agency Rules Using Data Law
【24h】

EPA Critics Float New Strategy To Challenge Agency Rules Using Data Law

机译：EPA评论家提出了使用数据法挑战代理商规则的新策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Backed by former White House regulatory review officials, a free-market advocate is proposing a new legal theory to allow states and private companies to sue EPA based on alleged violations of the Information Quality Act (IQA) in the development of a host of rules, dodging the long-standing holding that IQA violations are immune from judicial review. Federal courts have long held that private plaintiffs lack standing to challenge agency actions under the IQA, finding that the law lacks an explicit right of action and that suits brought under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) are not reviewable because challenged agency actions are not "final." But in a February white paper published by the Washington Legal Foundation (WLF), Lawrence A. Kogan, a trade lawyer and free-market advocate, suggests that states and private plaintiffs could have standing to challenge EPA's greenhouse gas (GHG) endangerment finding on the theory that the plaintiffs have a right to be free from regulations that are founded on flawed science that contravenes the law's intent. Relevant documents are available on InsideEPA.com. See page 2 for details. (Doc. ID: 179012) "The contemplated cause of action is based on the theory that Congress intended that the IQA ... protect the negative right of a designated class of persons not to be burdened, financially or otherwise, by poor quality science that agencies disseminate in support of major regulations," Kogan says in the paper, "Revitalizing The Information Quality Act As A Procedural Cure For Unsound Regulatory Science: A Greenhouse Gas Rulemaking Case Study."
机译：在前白宫监管审查官员的支持下，自由市场倡导者正在提出一种新的法律理论，以允许各州和私营公司根据指称的违反《信息质量法》（IQA）制定一系列规则来起诉EPA，避免长期以来一直认为违反IQA的行为不受司法审查。联邦法院长期以来一直认为，私人原告缺乏根据IQA质疑代理机构诉讼的资格，发现法律缺乏明确的诉讼权，并且根据《行政程序法》（APA）提起的诉讼不予审查，因为被质疑的代理机构的诉讼并非“最后。”但是在华盛顿法律基金会（WLF）于2月发布的白皮书中，贸易律师和自由市场倡导者劳伦斯·科根（Lawrence A. Kogan）建议，各州和私人原告可能有资格挑战EPA的温室气体（GHG）危害性调查结果。一种理论，即原告有权摆脱基于有缺陷的科学的法规而违反法律的意图。有关文件可在InsideEPA.com上找到。有关详细信息，请参见第2页。 （文档ID：179012）“预期的诉讼因由是基于国会希望IQA ...保护指定类别的人的消极权利的理论，而该权利不会受到质量低劣的科学的经济或其他负担。 Kogan在论文中说，“振兴信息质量法案是不健全的法规科学的程序性治疗：温室气体法规制定案例研究。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号