首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Appeals Court Rejects Review Of CWA Jurisdictional Finding Despite Sackett
【24h】

Appeals Court Rejects Review Of CWA Jurisdictional Finding Despite Sackett

机译:上诉法院拒绝对尽管萨克特的CWA司法裁决进行审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A federal appeals court has rejected industry's attempt to extend the landmark Supreme Court ruling requiring pre-enforcement review of some agency actions to include determinations that waterbodies are "jurisdictional" and subject to Clean Water Act (CWA) regulation, a decision that could soon return the issue to the high court. The July 30 ruling, by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, is the first by an appeals court to address whether courts can review jurisdictional determinations (JDs) since the Supreme Court's 2012 decision in Sackett v. EPA, which opened some pre-enforcement regulatory determinations to legal challenge.
机译:联邦上诉法院拒绝了业界试图扩大具有里程碑意义的最高法院裁决的企图,该裁决要求对某些机构的行动进行执法前审查,其中包括确定水体是“司法管辖区”并受《清洁水法》(CWA)监管的决定,该决定不久后将再次生效该问题提交高等法院。美国最高法院第五巡回上诉法院于7月30日作出的裁决,是自最高法院2012年最高法院在Sackett诉EPA的决定(该决定开启了某些-加强对法律挑战的监管决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号