首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Facing Legal Concern, Vitter Seeks To Clarify TSCA Bill's Tort Preemption
【24h】

Facing Legal Concern, Vitter Seeks To Clarify TSCA Bill's Tort Preemption

机译:面对法律问题,维特尔试图澄清TSCA比尔的侵权行为优先权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) has developed language to clarify a provision in the bipartisan Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) reform bill that some lawyers and others have charged limits the ability of private plaintiffs to bring toxic tort claims in state courts for harms caused by chemicals that EPA has deemed to be safe. During a July 10 conference call hosted by the Environmental Law Institute (ELI), Dimitri Karakitsos, Republican counsel on the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee (EPW), said that in drafting the language in S. 1009, Vitter never intended to "preempt or to eliminate state tort claims. We didn't read the language that way, we didn't write the language to read in that way."
机译:大卫·维特(R-LA)参议员开发了语言,以澄清两党有毒物质控制法案(TSCA)改革法案中的一项条款,其中一些律师和其他律师已指控该条款限制了私人原告向州法院提起有毒侵权指控的能力。 EPA认为是安全的化学物质造成的危害。在环境法学院(ELI)主持的7月10日的电话会议上,参议院环境与公共工程委员会(EPW)的共和党律师Dimitri Karakitsos说,维特在起草S. 1009中的语言时从未打算“抢先”或消除国家侵权索赔。我们没有那样阅读语言,我们没有那样编写语言来阅读。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号