• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >EPA Plans To Withdraw Controversial Rule On Brownfields Due Diligence
【24h】

EPA Plans To Withdraw Controversial Rule On Brownfields Due Diligence

机译：EPA计划撤销对Brownfields尽职调查的争议性规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

EPA will withdraw a controversial direct final rule updating brownfields due diligence requirements used to assess whether parties are exempt from cleanup liability, following adverse comment from observers who warned the plan risked creating regulatory confusion given that the agency also continues to endorse an earlier standard. Instead, the agency will formally rescind the direct final rule published in the Aug. IS Federal Register and proceed with a simultaneously proposed version of the regulation issued the same day. EPA will now assess comments received on the proposed version and use that to inform an upcoming final rule, the agency says. According to the statement, the reason for pulling the direct final rule is that EPA has "received adverse comments on the proposed rule." At press time, EPA's docket for the rule to update the standards and practices for all appropriate inquiries (AAI) at brownfields cleanups listed 14 public comments, with eight of those comments critical of the plan to recognize dual industry standards and/or the newer industry standard's definition of "environmental professional" responsible for overseeing the assessment process.
机译：环保署将撤回有争议的直接最终规则，以更新用于评估当事方是否免除清理责任的棕地尽职调查要求，此前观察家警告说，鉴于该机构还继续认可较早的标准，该计划有可能造成监管混乱。取而代之的是，该机构将正式撤销8月份IS联邦公报中发布的直接最终规则，并着手同时发布该法规的同一版本。 EPA现在将评估收到的关于建议版本的评论，并将其用作即将发布的最终法规的参考。声明说，取消直接最终规则的原因是EPA“收到了对拟议规则的不利评论”。截至发稿时，EPA要求在棕地清理中更新所有适当查询（AAI）标准和规范的规则摘要中列出了14条公众意见，其中有8条批评了承认双重行业标准和/或较新行业的计划该标准对“环境专业人员”的定义负责监督评估过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号