首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Court Urged To Revisit Ozone NAAQS 'Margin Of Safety' In Rehearing Bid
【24h】

Court Urged To Revisit Ozone NAAQS 'Margin Of Safety' In Rehearing Bid

机译:法院敦促重新审理臭氧NAAQS“安全裕度”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Environmentalists and states supportive of a stricter ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) are urging a federal appeals court panel to rehear its decision upholding the agency's 2008 ozone NAAQS, saying the court erred by failing to ensure that EPA's standard met an "adequate margin of safety" to protect public health. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit three-judge panel's July 23 opinion upholding the primary, health-based ozone standard "fails to address a critical defect in EPA's ozone NAAQS decision - namely, the agency's complete failure to explain how the health standard provided an adequate margin of safety to sensitive populations," as required under the Clean Air Act, environmentalists say in a Sept. 6 rehearing petition. Relevant documents are available on InsideEPA.com. Seepage 2 for details. (Doc ID: 2446179) Similarly, a coalition of 12 states in a separate rehearing petition the same day says it supports die environmentalists' request, saying the panel "overlooked or misapprehended'' the provisions of the air law that mandated EPA must ensure its standard of 75 parts per billion (ppb) was adequate to protect public health.
机译:环境保护主义者和支持更严格的臭氧国家环境空气质量标准(NAAQS)的州正在敦促联邦上诉法院小组对维持该机构2008年臭氧NAAQS的裁决进行复审,称法院因未能确保EPA的标准达到“足够的利润”而犯了错误。安全”以保护公众健康。美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院三审法官小组在7月23日维持基于健康的主要臭氧标准的意见“未能解决EPA臭氧NAAQS决定中的一个关键缺陷-即,该机构完全无法解释环保主义者在9月6日的复审请愿书中说,健康标准为敏感人群提供了足够的安全余地。”有关文件可在InsideEPA.com上找到。有关详细信息,请参见第2页。 (文档ID:2446179)类似地,同一天,由12个州组成的联盟在一个单独的彩排请愿书中说,它支持环保主义者的要求,并称该小组“忽略或误解了”空气法中要求EPA必须确保其环境保护的规定。十亿分之75(ppb)的标准足以保护公众健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号