首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Industry Says EPA Analysis Of Coal Bed Methane Permits Unnecessary
【24h】

Industry Says EPA Analysis Of Coal Bed Methane Permits Unnecessary

机译:业界表示,EPA对煤层气许可证的分析不必要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Industry is questioning EPA's decision to pursue an analysis of states' permits for effluent discharges from coal bed methane (CBM) operations, saying the analysis is unwarranted and an injudicious use of EPA resources and reiterating its opposition to any future federal effluent limits for CBM operations.rnActivists, however, say a federal effluent limitations guideline (ELG) for CBM is vitally needed to protect water quality and to help states enforce stringent permitting requirements. And some environmentalists are urging EPA to also consider new ELGs for all oil and gas exploration and extraction techniques- including hydraulic fracturing - "that result in contamination of surface and groundwater," according to recent comments on EPA's preliminary 2010 ELG program plan from Earthjustice.
机译:工业界对EPA决定对各州的煤层气(CBM)运营废水排放许可进行分析的决定表示质疑,称该分析是无根据的,并且对EPA资源的使用不当,并重申其反对任何未来联邦对CBM运营的废水排放限制.rn活动家说,为保护水质并帮助各州执行严格的许可要求,迫切需要建立煤层气的联邦排放限制准则(ELG)。根据来自Earthjustice的EPA初步2010年ELG计划计划的最新评论,一些环保主义者敦促EPA还考虑将所有石油和天然气勘探和开采技术(包括水力压裂)使用新的ELG,“这会导致地表和地下水污染”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号