High Court Appeal Likely In Water Act Jurisdictional Determination Case

首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >High Court Appeal Likely In Water Act Jurisdictional Determination Case

【24h】

High Court Appeal Likely In Water Act Jurisdictional Determination Case

机译：高等法院可能在水法管辖权判决案件中上诉

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Property rights advocates are preparing to file a Supreme Court cert petition on behalf of the city of Fairbanks,AK,seeking high court review of whether property owners may sue for a reversal of a Clean Water Act (CWA) wetlands jurisdictional determination before obtaining a dredge-and-fill permit. The plaintiffs in Fairbanks North Star Borough v.U.S.Army Corps of Engineers filed a petition with the U.S.Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit Oct.23 seeking an en bane rehearing of the case.The appellate court ruled Sept.12 that Corps determinations finding wetlands are waters of the United States "are not final agency action within the meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act." The ruling let stand a lower court ruling holding that federal courts do not have jurisdiction over CWA determinations.

机译：产权拥护者正准备代表阿肯色州的费尔班克斯市提交最高法院的证明请愿书，寻求高等法院审查财产所有者是否可以在获得疏edge之前起诉撤销《清洁水法》（CWA）湿地的管辖权决定加油许可证。 Fairbanks North Star Borough vUSArmy Corps of Engineers的原告已于10月23日向美国上诉法院提交第9巡回上诉法院的请愿书，以寻求对案件进行彻底的复审。9月12日，上诉法院裁定Corps裁定发现湿地的决定是美国水域“不是《行政诉讼法》所指的最终代理行动”。该裁决维持了较低的法院裁决，该裁决认为联邦法院对CWA的裁决没有管辖权。

著录项

来源
《Inside EPA's environmental policy alert》 |2008年第25期|p.18-19|共2页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类环境科学、安全科学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Class Action Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Interlocutory Appeals [J] . Supreme Court of Texas Oil and Gas Reporter . 2014,第1期

机译：法院的管辖权，程序和审查：集体诉讼法院的管辖权，程序和审查：中间上诉
2. Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Class Action Court Jurisdiction, Procedure and Review: Interlocutory Appeals [J] . Texas Court of Appeals—Houston 14th Dist Oil and Gas Reporter . 2014,第1期

机译：法院的管辖权，程序和审查：集体诉讼法院的管辖权，程序和审查：中间上诉
3. Ninth Circuit: Federal District Court Has Jurisdiction over Appeals of State Engineer Rulings on Groundwater Permits that are Alleged to Affect Tribe's Surface Water Rights under the Orr Ditch Decree [J] . Water Law Newsletter . 2011,第2期

机译：第九巡回法院：联邦地方法院对国家工程师对根据Orr Ditch法令指控涉嫌影响部落的地表水权的地下水许可证的上诉拥有管辖权
4. Great News for Indian Country: Recent Decisions by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court on Tribal Authority to Regulate the Environment [C] . David R. LaRoche Air Waste Management Association's Annual Conference Exhibition . 2002

机译：印度国家的伟大消息：美国巡回赛上诉法院和美国最高法院对部落权力的决定
5. An Empirical Study of the Political Party Balance Requirement of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and Its Predecessor-Court, the United States Court of Military Appeals, from 1951 to 2016 [D] . Anderson, David A. 2017

机译：1951年至2016年美国武装部队及其前身上诉法院对政党平衡要求的实证研究
6. Report of the departmental committee on the social services in courts of summary jurisdiction [O] . Cecil Binney 1937

机译：简易程序法院社会服务部门委员会的报告
7. The Function (or Malfunction) of Equity in the Charity Law of Canada’s Federal Courts: This essay explores what, if anything, it means for the Federal Court of Appeal to be a “court of equity” in the exercise of its jurisdiction over matters related to charitable registration under the Income Tax Act. The equitable jurisdiction over charities encompasses a number of curative principles, which the Court of Chancery traditionally invoked to save indefinite or otherwise defective charitable gifts. The author identifies some of these equitable principles and contemplates how their invocation might have altered the course of certain unsuccessful charitable registration appeals. She then considers the principal arguments for and against the Federal Court of Appeal applying these equitable principles when adjudicating matters related to registered charity status. [O] . 2016

机译：加拿大联邦法院《慈善法》中的平等职能（或失灵）：本文探讨了联邦上诉法院在行使对相关事宜的管辖权时成为“平等法院”的含义（如果有的话）根据《所得税法》进行慈善注册。对慈善组织的公平管辖权包括许多治疗原则，传统上，检举法院援引这些原则以保存无限期或其他有缺陷的慈善礼物。作者指出了其中一些公平原则，并考虑了其调用可能如何改变了某些不成功的慈善注册上诉的过程。然后，她在裁定与注册慈善身分有关的事项时，考虑支持和反对联邦上诉法院的主要论据，运用这些公平原则。

High Court Appeal Likely In Water Act Jurisdictional Determination Case

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅