• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Key Ruling May Allow Epa Overfiling After State Administrative Fines
【24h】

Key Ruling May Allow Epa Overfiling After State Administrative Fines

机译：国家行政罚款后，主要裁定可能允许Epa泄漏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A federal appeals court has ruled for the first time that state administrative proceedings under the Clean Water Act (CWA) do not preempt citizen enforcement suits-and even EPA enforcement-in certain circumstances, creating the prospect of dual enforcement tracks for dischargers unless states initiate stricter and more costly judicial enforcement proceedings. The case is the first decision at the appellate level on whether a provision lifting preemption of citizen suits in certain circumstances applies to states and not just the federal government, legal experts say, which has important ramifications for the federalism balance in the clean water law. The case is also important because it mirrors the legal development of other environmental laws like the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act and the Surface Mining Control & Reclamation Act. Other environmental laws have seen litigation over the scope of citizen suits and their federal-state balance, with litigation often resting on similar clauses to that in question of the CWA, legal experts say.
机译：联邦上诉法院首次裁定，在某些情况下，根据《清洁水法》（CWA）实施的州行政诉讼不得抢先于公民执法诉讼，甚至是EPA执法，这为排放者创造了双重执法的可能性，除非各州主动发起。更严格，成本更高的司法执行程序。法律专家说，此案是上诉一级关于在特定情况下取消公民诉讼优先权的规定是否适用于州而不是联邦政府的第一个决定，这对清洁水法中的联邦制平衡具有重要影响。该案也很重要，因为它反映了其他环境法律的法律发展，例如《资源保护与回收法》和《露天采矿控制与回收法》。法律专家说，其他环境法也涉及到针对公民诉讼范围及其联邦州平衡的诉讼，诉讼通常基于与CWA问题类似的条款。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号