...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Planning. A >Explaining continuity and change in international policies:issue linkage, venue change, and learning on policies for the river Scheldt estuary 1967-2005
【24h】

Explaining continuity and change in international policies:issue linkage, venue change, and learning on policies for the river Scheldt estuary 1967-2005

机译：解释国际政策的连续性和变化：问题的联系，场所的变化以及1967-2005年Scheldt河口政策的学习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper aims to assess the explanatory power and to explore the compatibility of three major accounts of policy continuity and change in cross-border policy domains: negotiation analysis (NA), the advocacy coalition framework (ACF), and the punctuated-equilibrium (PE) framework. These frameworks are used to analyze policies for the river Scheldt estuary between 1967 and 2005. The estuary of the river Scheldt is situated partly in the Belgian region of Flanders and partly in the Netherlands. Major international policy issues in this estuary are the maritime access to the port of Antwerp, water and sediment pollution, and estuarine rehabilitation. It will be shown that the negotiations on these issues are characterized by complex issue linkages, and that NA does very well in explaining both deadlocks and international policy agreement. However, unlike the ACF, NA does not specify how actors come to define their interests. Moreover, we will argue that learning across the prodevelopment Antwerp coalition and the cross-border environmentalist coalition accounts for a gradual convergence of Dutch and Flemish perceived interests. Finally, PE offers useful complementary insights as Scheldt estuary policies cannot be understood without addressing the interrelations between the processes of negotiation, learning, the creation and enforcement of game rules, which have been going on in different venues simultaneously.
机译：本文旨在评估解释力并探讨政策连续性和跨境政策领域变化的三个主要方面的相容性：谈判分析（NA），倡导联盟框架（ACF）和标点平衡（PE） ）框架。这些框架用于分析1967年至2005年之间Scheldt河口的政策。Scheldt河口的一部分位于比利时的法兰德斯地区，另一部分位于荷兰。该河口的主要国际政策问题是海上进入安特卫普港，水和沉积物污染以及河口修复。可以看出，关于这些问题的谈判具有复杂的问题联系，而北美联盟在解释僵局和国际政策协定方面做得很好。但是，与ACF不同，NA不指定参与者如何定义其利益。此外，我们将争辩说，在蓬勃发展的安特卫普联盟和跨境环保主义者联盟中学习，就说明了荷兰人和佛兰德人的利益逐渐趋同。最后，体育提供了有用的补充见解，因为如果不解决在不同场所同时进行的谈判，学习，游戏规则的制定和执行过程之间的相互关系，就无法理解谢尔特河口政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号