...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >The curious death - and life? - of British transport policy
【24h】

The curious death - and life? - of British transport policy

机译:好奇的死亡-生命? -英国运输政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article analyses the transport policy record of the 2010-2015 Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition and 2015-2016 Conservative majority UK governments. We argue that the style of policy making under these administrations departed significantly from that of previous decades, which had been characterised by the ascendancy of specific technical disciplines and decision-making norms about how transport planning should be carried out. Our key contention is that despite abandoning the idea of a single, overall narrative for transport policy, these governments (perhaps unwittingly) gave new life to broader debates about what transport investment is actually for and how investment decisions should be made. We interpret this as a shift away from the longstanding idea of a 'deliberate' strategy of intervention to a more 'emergent' approach, which raises important new questions about the future of transport policy both in terms of the objectives it seeks to realise and the relative influence of professional/technical and political actors in the policy process.
机译:本文分析了2010-2015年保守党-自由民主党联盟和2015-2016年英国保守党多数政府的运输政策记录。我们认为,这些政府领导下的决策风格与前几十年大不相同,后者的特征是特定技术学科的兴起和关于如何进行交通规划的决策规范。我们的主要论点是,尽管放弃了关于运输政策的单一,整体描述的思想,但这些政府(也许是不经意间)为有关运输投资到底是什么以及应如何制定投资决策的广泛辩论提供了新的活力。我们将其解释为从长期的“蓄意”干预策略观念转变为更加“紧急”的方法观念的转变,这在运输政策的实现目标和目标方面提出了关于运输政策未来的重要新问题。专业/技术和政治参与者在政策制定过程中的相对影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号