...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Integrative governance: The relationships between governance instruments taking center stage
【24h】

Integrative governance: The relationships between governance instruments taking center stage

机译：整合治理：治理工具之间的关系处于中心地位

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The fragmentation and complexity of governance are well recognized among scholars and policy makers. The debate on fragmentation has itself, however, also remained rather fragmented. This has inhibited the drawing of common lessons among the different communities, and has delayed the development of more concerted efforts to enhance synergies and address trade-offs between different societal goals. In order to move forward, this theme issue shows that the various disconnected debates are in essence trying to do the same thing-contribute to the discussion on the relationships between governance instruments. In order to do so, it is based on and advances the notion of Integrative Governance, defined as the theories and practices that focus on the relationships between governance instruments and/or governance systems. The theme issue serves the debate in two ways: (1) it contributes to the "defragmentation" of the debate by bringing together the different concepts and approaches used to study Integrative Governance and (2) it furthers the debate by addressing the main gaps in the Integrative Governance literature. Each article contributes to both aims of the theme issue by making conceptual links between the different approaches, and by addressing multiple gaps in the literature. As such, the theme issue as a whole contributes to a better understanding of the relationships between governance instruments, with a view to enhance these relationships and governance performance.
机译：治理的分散性和复杂性在学者和决策者中得到了很好的认识。然而，关于分裂的辩论本身也仍然相当分散。这阻碍了不同社区之间共同经验的汲取，并延迟了为加强协同作用和解决不同社会目标之间的取舍问题而作出的更加一致努力的发展。为了向前推进，这一主题问题表明，各种脱节的辩论本质上是在试图做同样的事情，从而为关于治理工具之间关系的讨论做出了贡献。为此，它基于并推进了“集成治理”的概念，该概念定义为着眼于治理工具和/或治理系统之间关系的理论和实践。主题问题通过两种方式为辩论服务：（1）通过整合用于研究一体化治理的不同概念和方法，为辩论的“碎片整理”做出贡献；（2）通过解决主要问题扩大辩论综合治理文献中的空白。每篇文章通过在不同方法之间建立概念性联系，并解决文献中的多个空白，对主题问题的两个目标都有贡献。这样，整个主题问题有助于更好地理解治理工具之间的关系，以期增强这些关系和治理绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号