...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environment & Behavior >Feeling Safe in the Dark: Examining the Effect of Entrapment, Lighting Levels, and Gender on Feelings of Safety and Lighting Policy Acceptability
【24h】

Feeling Safe in the Dark: Examining the Effect of Entrapment, Lighting Levels, and Gender on Feelings of Safety and Lighting Policy Acceptability

机译：在黑暗中感到安全：检查陷害，照明水平和性别对安全感和照明政策可接受性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This research examined to what extent physical factors, notably lighting and entrapment (blocked escape), and individual factors, notably gender, affect feelings of safety and the acceptability of reduced lighting levels.The authors reasoned that acceptability of reduced street lighting depends on perceived safety, which in turn depends on entrapment, lighting, and gender. Virtual representations of a residential street were used, systematically manipulating entrapment and lighting levels. As expected, people felt less safe in lower lighting and higher entrapment settings, and these settings were evaluated as less acceptable.Although women perceived a situation as less safe compared with men, the authors found no gender differences in acceptability, which extends previous research. Importantly, as hypothesized, perceived safety mediated the effect of lighting on acceptability levels, suggesting that people can accept lower lighting levels when social safety is not threatened.
机译：这项研究调查了在何种程度上物理因素（特别是照明和诱捕（阻碍逃生））以及个体因素（特别是性别）影响安全感和减少照明水平的可接受性。作者认为减少街道照明的可接受性取决于感知的安全性，这又取决于诱捕，照明和性别。使用了住宅街道的虚拟表示，系统地操纵了诱捕和照明水平。不出所料，人们在较低的光线和较高的诱捕环境中感觉不太安全，并且对这些环境的评估也较差。尽管女性认为情况比男性安全性低，但作者发现可接受性上没有性别差异，这扩大了先前的研究范围。重要的是，如假设的那样，感知到的安全性介导了照明对可接受水平的影响，这表明人们在不威胁社会安全的情况下可以接受较低的照明水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号