...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environment, development and sustainability >Exploring decentralized forest management in Ethiopia using actor-power-accountability framework: case study in West Shoa zone
【24h】

Exploring decentralized forest management in Ethiopia using actor-power-accountability framework: case study in West Shoa zone

机译：使用行动者－权力－责任制框架探索埃塞俄比亚的权力下放森林管理：西绍阿地区的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Decentralized forest management is a pivotal approach in Ethiopia for balancing biodiversity conservation with demand for economic development, and for improving forest-dependent local peoples' livelihoods. With the aim of filling the literature gap on Ethiopia, this paper explores the dynamics of decentralization in the forestry sector using the actor-power-accountability framework. Generally, three forms of decentralization are practiced: deconcentration to government administrative branches, devolution of selected decision-making power to local people, and delegation to enterprises. Although transfer of meaningful discretionary power to local people or to downwardly accountable lower-tier governments is a precondition for achieving positive outcomes from decentralization, this prerequisite has been realized in none of the three forms decentralization. Overall, three important trends emerged from the latest decentralization reform, which was a switch from the conservation-oriented deconcentration form of decentralization to the income generation-oriented delegation form of decentralization. Those trends are as follows: monetary income generation for local people through enterprise, albeit with possible risk of being deprived of income and subsistence opportunities on which local people depend for their livelihoods; moving decision-making power away from the grassroots; and lack of incentive to manage natural forests, a major source of biodiversity.
机译：分散森林管理是埃塞俄比亚的关键方法，可以平衡生物多样性保护与经济发展的需求，并改善依赖森林的当地人民的生计。为了填补埃塞俄比亚的文献空白，本文使用行动者－权力－问责制框架探索了林业部门权力下放的动态。通常，实行三种形式的权力下放：权力下放到政府行政部门，选定的决策权下放给当地人民以及下放给企业。尽管将有意义的自由裁量权转移给当地人民或负有责任的下层政府是从权力下放中获得积极成果的前提，但这种前提条件在三种形式的权力下放中都没有实现。总体而言，最近的权力下放改革出现了三个重要趋势，即从以保护为导向的权力下放形式向以创收为目的的权力下放形式转变。这些趋势如下：通过企业为当地人民创造货币收入，尽管有被剥夺当地人民赖以生存的收入和生存机会的风险；将决策权从基层转移出去；缺乏管理天然林的积极性，天然林是生物多样性的主要来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号