...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Vine St. LLC v. Borg Warner Corp
【24h】

Vine St. LLC v. Borg Warner Corp

机译:藤街LLC诉Borg Warner Corp

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Parent of manufacturer of dry cleaning equipment is not liable under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act or Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act to owner of contaminated property for share of cleanup costs as party that arranged for disposal of hazardous substances, because: (1) federal district court found manufacturer lacked specific intent to dispose of hazardous substances; (2) even though manufacturer knew small amounts of perchloroethylene would escape from equipment into sewer system, disposal occurred as peripheral result of legitimate sale of useful product and spills were unintentional; and (3) even though manufacturer installed equipment and connected water separators to sewer system, installation and connection did not establish intent to dispose of hazardous substances.
机译:根据《综合环境响应,赔偿和责任法》或《德克萨斯州固体废物处置法》,干洗设备制造商的母公司对安排处置有害物质的当事方不负有责任向污染财产的所有人收取清洁费用,原因是:(1 )联邦地方法院裁定制造商缺乏处置有害物质的具体意图; (2)即使制造商知道少量的四氯乙烯将从设备中逃逸到下水道系统中,但由于合法销售有用产品的外围结果而发生了处置,并且无意泄漏。 (3)即使制造商安装了设备并将分水器连接到下水道系统,安装和连接也没有确定处置有害物质的意图。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter》 |2015年第18期|1977-1983|共7页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号