...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Industry Says Supreme Court Decision Has Warning Signs for Power Plant Rules
【24h】

Industry Says Supreme Court Decision Has Warning Signs for Power Plant Rules

机译:业界称最高法院的裁决对电厂法规有警告信号

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A U.S. Supreme Court decision limiting the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency's greenhouse gas permitting program won't directly impact its efforts to regulate carbon dioxide from power plants (Util. Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, U.S., No. 12-1146,6/23/14). But the June 23 decision written by Justice Antonin Scalia is providing plenty of rhetorical ammunition to industry groups that argue the agency's proposed carbon dioxide standards for existing power plants exceed its statutory authority. In a footnote, Scalia acknowledged the EPA's authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from industrial sources such as power plants under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act, but attorneys said his opinion is full of language regarding regulatory overreach that should caution the agency as it readies its rules.
机译:美国最高法院限制环境保护署温室气体排放计划范围的决定不会直接影响其调节发电厂二氧化碳的努力(Util。Air Regulatory Grp。诉EPA,美国,第12-1146号, 14年6月23日)。但是,安东宁·斯卡利亚大法官(Antonin Scalia)6月23日的裁决为工业团体提供了大量的口头弹药,他们认为该机构为现有电厂提出的二氧化碳标准超出了其法定权限。在一个脚注中,斯卡利亚承认EPA有权根据《清洁空气法》第111条管制发电厂等工业来源的二氧化碳排放,但律师表示,他的意见充满了关于监管超标的措辞,应在准备就绪时警告该机构。它的规则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号