...
【24h】

BNA Insights

机译:见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit vacating and remanding a biological opinion by the National Marine Fisheries Service regarding registration of three pesticides by the Environmental Protection Agency underscores the difficulty of expeditious review and approval of pesticide products. This article reviews the context and holding of the Fourth Circuit's ruling, the decision's implications, and how they reasonably can be addressed within the context of interagency consultations under the Endangered Species Act.
机译:美国第四巡回上诉法院最近作出的一项决定,是撤消并退回国家海洋渔业局关于环境保护局对三种农药进行注册的生物学意见,这凸显了迅速审查和批准农药产品的困难。本文回顾了第四巡回法院裁决的背景和裁定,该裁决的含义以及在《濒危物种法》下的机构间磋商中如何合理地解决这些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号