The U.S. Supreme Court held June 17 that the Florida Supreme Court did not engage in an illegal taking of property when it upheld an erosion control project that resulted in six residents losing direct access to their beach front (Stop the Beach Renourish-ment Inc. v. Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection, U.S., No. 08-1151,6/17/10).rnWhile the court was unanimous on that question, the justices were sharply divided over the larger issue of whether a court could ever be found to have engaged in a property taking without paying the owners just compensation.
展开▼
机译：美国最高法院于6月17日裁定，佛罗里达最高法院坚持一项侵蚀控制项目，导致六名居民无法直接进入其海滨，因此并未从事非法收受财产的行为（Stop the Beach Renourish-ment Inc. v （美国佛罗里达环境保护局，编号08-1151,6 / 17/10）。虽然法院在该问题上取得一致意见，但在更大的问题上，法院是否能够被法院裁定是否存在分歧，使法官们意见分歧。在没有向业主支付公正赔偿的情况下从事财产收取。
展开▼
