...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >District Court Finds Property Manager Not Liable as Owner Based on Control of Site
【24h】

District Court Finds Property Manager Not Liable as Owner Based on Control of Site

机译:地方法院基于对场地的控制,认定物业经理不承担业主责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A company hired to manage a shopping center cannot be liable as an owner under the superfund law for contamination on the property, a federal trial court in Georgia ruled Sept. 30 (Scarlett & Associates Inc. v. Briarcliff Center Partners LLC, N.D. Ga., No. 05-CV-145, 9/30/09).rnFocusing on the property manager's degree of control over the site, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia found it significant that property manager Faison & Associates Inc. could not enter into or renew a tenant lease without the approval of the company that hired it to run the shopping center.rnFaison does, however, face potential liability as an operator under the superfund law based on allegations that it exercised control over the waste disposal activities of a dry cleaner that operated on the site, the court said.rnThe court also ruled that evidence of continuing waste migration is sufficient to show a "continuous or ongoing violation" of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, allowing an allegation against Faison under RCRA to proceed.
机译:根据超级基金法,受雇经营购物中心的公司不应对所有者造成财产污染承担责任,乔治亚州的联邦初审法院于9月30日裁定(Scarlett&Associates Inc.诉Briarcliff Center Partners LLC,ND Ga。 ,编号05-CV-145,9 / 30/09)。rn由于佐治亚州北部地区美国地方法院对财产管理人对场地的控制程度,发现财产管理人Faison&Associates Inc.未经租赁公司经营购物中心的公司的批准,不得签订或续签租约。rnFaison确实根据超级基金法面临经营者的潜在责任,理由是该公司对废物处理活动实行控制法院说:“法院对现场运行的干洗店进行了调查。”法院还裁定,废物持续迁移的证据足以表明“持续或持续违反”《资源保护和回收法》。向RCRA提出针对Faison的指控继续进行。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter》 |2009年第41期|2408-2409|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号