...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental & Resource Economics >Sectors Under Scrutiny: Evaluation of Indicators to Assess the Risk of Carbon Leakage in the UK and Germany
【24h】

Sectors Under Scrutiny: Evaluation of Indicators to Assess the Risk of Carbon Leakage in the UK and Germany

机译:受到审查的行业:评估评估英国和德国碳泄漏风险的指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the central debates surrounding the design of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme is the approach to address carbon leakage concerns. Correctly identifying the economic activities exposed to the risk of carbon leakage represents the first step in mitigating the risk effectively. This paper assesses the robustness of the quantitative assessment criteria used by the European Commission for Phase 3. For example we apply the criteria to data for UK and Germany and compare the results with the Commissions' assessment conducted at the aggregated EU level. This reveals that sectors' exposure risk to carbon leakage can vary across different Member States due to differences in production processes, technologies and fuel mix; process emissions; recycling rate differences; product mix differences; sector classification, statistical boundaries, activity allocation differences; and finally difference in data quality. Overall, we find that relative carbon intensity of sectors, measured as cost increase relative to gross value added, provides a robust metric. The analysis also highlights the importance of using high quality and disaggregated data for this assessment.
机译:围绕欧盟排放交易计划设计的中心辩论之一是解决碳泄漏问题的方法。正确识别暴露于碳泄漏风险的经济活动是有效降低风险的第一步。本文评估了欧洲委员会针对第3阶段使用的定量评估标准的稳健性。例如,我们将该标准应用于英国和德国的数据,并将结果与​​欧盟在汇总欧盟水平上进行的评估进行了比较。这表明,由于生产工艺,技术和燃料组合的差异,不同成员国的部门面临的碳泄漏风险可能会有所不同;过程排放;回收率差异;产品组合差异;行业分类,统计界限,活动分配差异;最后是数据质量的差异。总体而言,我们发现,部门的相对碳强度以相对于总增加值的成本增加来衡量,提供了一个可靠的指标。该分析还强调了使用高质量和分类数据进行评估的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号