...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental & Resource Economics >Does Public Funding Affect Preferred Tradeoffs and Crowd-In or Crowd-Out Willingness to Pay? A Watershed Management Case
【24h】

Does Public Funding Affect Preferred Tradeoffs and Crowd-In or Crowd-Out Willingness to Pay? A Watershed Management Case

机译：公共资金会影响首选的权衡和挤入或挤出支付的意愿吗？分水岭管理案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In discrete choice experiments, survey participants are often asked to consider stated cost, to themselves, as a source of funding of an environmental project. An open ques­tion remains whether participants would consider an additional source of funding, such as public or federal support. We examine the impact of federal funding availability on the mar­ginal utility of management attributes and on respondents' private willingness to pay (WTP) for watershed management plans. Our results suggest that availability of public funding does not significantly alter the preferred tradeoffs among management attributes for active man­agement plans, but alters the utility difference, and therefore the WTP, between an active plan and the status quo alternative. A latent class model further suggests that classes with rela­tively similar preferences may nonetheless show heterogeneity in how availability of public funds affects WTP for management plans against the status quo, depending on individuals' sociodemographic profiles and environmental attitudes. Public funding affects WTP through both crowding-in and crowding-out effects. Our results suggest that private responses to pub­lic funds may be more complex than previous studies on public goods have suggested, as public funds may neither attract contributions nor crowd out private support uniformly.
机译：在离散选择实验中，经常要求调查参与者自己考虑陈述的成本，将其作为环境项目的资金来源。参与者是否会考虑其他资金来源（例如公共或联邦支持）仍是一个公开的问题。我们研究了联邦资金可用性对管理属性的边际效用以及对受访者私人为分水岭管理计划支付的意愿（WTP）的影响。我们的结果表明，公共资金的可获得性不会显着改变主动管理计划的管理属性之间的优先权衡，但会改变主动计划与现状替代方案之间的效用差异，从而改变WTP。潜在的阶级模型进一步表明，具有相对相似偏好的阶级可能仍然显示出异质性，这取决于个人的社会人口概况和环境态度，公共资金的可获得性如何影响针对现状的管理计划的WTP。公共资金通过挤入和挤出效应影响污水处理厂。我们的结果表明，私人对公共资金的反应可能比以前对公共物品的研究建议的更为复杂，因为公共资金可能既不会吸引捐款，也不会统一挤出私人支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号