...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental & Resource Economics >Sulfur allowance Trading and the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market: A comparative Design Analysis of Two Major Cap-and-Trade Permit Programs?
【24h】

Sulfur allowance Trading and the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market: A comparative Design Analysis of Two Major Cap-and-Trade Permit Programs?

机译:硫磺配额交易和区域清洁空气激励市场:两个主要的总量控制和交易许可计划的比较设计分析?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates in detail the design parameters of the two most prominent US cap-and-trade permit program - the US EPA Sulfur Allowance Trading Program and the South Californian Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM). In contrast to expectations the two Programs turn out to be rather different in several important design parameter choices. Common Elements emerge primarily in the existence of an ambitious, quantified environmental target, manda- tory use of stringent emission monitoring methods and stiff penalties for non-compliance, coexisting Command-and-control regulations, the creation of a competitive permit market structure, and some Distributional concessions in the initial permit allocation. Generalizing from these common features We find that provisions to assure political acceptance, functional interdependencies and overlapping Regulation are the most important influences on the design of applied cap-and-trade permit programs.
机译:本文详细研究了美国两个最著名的总量控制和交易许可证计划的设计参数-美国EPA硫磺配额交易计划和南加州区域清洁空气激励市场(RECLAIM)。与预期相反,这两个程序在几个重要的设计参数选择上差异很大。共同要素的出现主要是由于存在雄心勃勃,量化的环境目标,强制使用严格的排放监控方法和对不遵守规定的严厉处罚,并存的命令与控制条例,建立竞争性许可证市场结构以及初始许可证分配中的一些分配优惠。从这些共同特征概括我们发现,确保政治上的接受,职能上的相互依存关系和重叠的法规的规定是对应用总量控制和排放许可计划设计的最重要影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号