...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental communication >Green Lawfare: Environmental Public Interest Litigation and Mediatized Environmental Conflict
【24h】

Green Lawfare: Environmental Public Interest Litigation and Mediatized Environmental Conflict

机译:绿色法律:环境公益诉讼与环境中介冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Communication strategies involving news media and environmental groups are well documented and research into protest politics and other forms of environmental communication has made considerable progress in the analysis of the strategies that various actors use to influence environmental policy. There is less scholarship, however, on the journalistic representation of the legal strategies employed by environmental non-government organizations, such as the mediatized debates about the use of law by these groups and the laws themselves. Further, while legal scholarship observes the role of public interest litigation in environmental matters, the role of news media as an influential force in public opinion formation and mobilization in the context of environmental litigation as an activist strategy remains less understood. Using the 2015 green lawfare debate in Australia that followed a successful Australian Federal Court challenge to a coalmine, this paper argues that the mediatized visibility inherent in public interest litigation is an important, but mostly overlooked, element of mediatized environmental conflict.
机译:涉及新闻媒体和环境团体的传播策略已得到充分记录,对抗议政治和其他形式的环境传播的研究在各种参与者用来影响环境政策的策略的分析中取得了长足的进步。但是,关于环境非政府组织所采用的法律战略的新闻报道的学术研究较少,例如,关于这些团体和法律本身对法律使用的调解辩论。此外,尽管法律学者观察到了公益诉讼在环境事务中的作用,但在环境诉讼作为一种激进主义策略的背景下,新闻媒体在舆论形成和动员中的影响力的作用仍然鲜为人知。继澳大利亚联邦法院成功对一个煤矿提出质疑之后,本文使用了2015年在澳大利亚举行的绿色法律辩论,该论文认为,公益诉讼固有的调解能见度是调解环境冲突的一个重要但大部分被忽视的因素。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号